Reply to Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Harris beating Trump in Iowa"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The better question is how this poll squares with the rise in GOP registrations in Iowa and her own previous polling just a couple months ago that didn’t match this surge.[/quote]

between a "couple of months ago" and now, an abortion ban was implemented.[/quote]
Maga’s refusal to grasp this is like in a movie where the antagonist has murdered a beloved main character and has some sort of mental block about what they’ve done. Maga can keep pretending that their abortion bans aren’t a big deal, that all it means is that irresponsible 20 somethings won’t be able to go out with their fellow lady friend sluts and get abortions on a Friday night, but they’re only fooling themselves. [/quote]
[twitter]https://x.com/piper4missouri/status/1853140041973039222[/twitter][/quote]

This. Women vote to improve and protect the community. [/quote]

A lot of post menopausal women are pro life or happy with this decided at the state level. This random twitter lady doesn’t speak for all women.[/quote]

I don’t know a single post-menopausal woman who would want the state deciding this if it was their daughter who was raped and pregnant— I know plenty of Catholics and I think some of them might even carry that baby but to pretend they know the answer for everyone? No[/quote]

[b]Almost[/b] all states have rape exceptions.   
[/quote]

Jfc, as if that makes it a good thing.[/quote]

It was dumb to argue as if it is an either or question. You can have state abortion limitations that account for the rare cases of rape induced pregnancies.
And [b]most[/b] states do.[/quote]

You realize that real women live under these draconian laws which you gloss over with your the language of “most” and “almost all”. It’s gross.

[/quote]

Those real women are voters in the states with those restrictions. Unlike with roe vs wade, they can take actions from campaigning to voting to enact the regulations that most match their values.

You seem to forget that pro life women exist. [/quote]

What I don’t understand is it’s going to soon affect pregnant women, especially with high risk of unknown complications, in those states because doctors and specialists are leaving Florida and Texas and the South in record numbers. Nobody thinks of the unintended consequences. [/quote]

They think about them. They have been told ad nauseum and they do not care. Women's lives are utterly unimportant to them (of course they somehow believe their wives and daughters will somehow be protected)[/quote]

But these are women voting anti-choice, per the pp I responded to. They’re putting their own pregnancies at risk. [/quote]
Yes, and they’ll run their hypocritical butts to Minnesota or Illinois when the crap hits the fan, if it’s something that can wait a day’s travel.

Or they’ll die for want of medical care and only then will their husband and mother realize what they’ve done, what they’ve supported. [/quote]

That sounds implausible. How is someone going to get a doctor in another state when they're pregnant? Clearly a lot of women aren't thinking of the unintended consequences. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics