Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Cheating Scandal Triggering TJ Change"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This thread just reveals that the same unfounded claim has been repeated since the beginning. Pretty funny actually. Thanks for proving that there has never been any proof of cheating… even since the beginning.[/quote] :roll: TJ students explained how it all went down. Do you think a bunch of them are lying? [/quote] Link to a story or account of the cheating. No one thinks that kids are lying. We all think you're the one lying, since you keep asserting that things happened without providing any proof. Yeah, I know you'll just insist that there are numerous links in the thread. Or you'll post something that proves that rich kids are doing test prep or something. You claim there's proof. Post it right here and now. Indicate exactly where they specifically talk about cheating. [/quote] You are confusing posters. I never said “cheating”. Affluent families pushed their kids to do test prep - using actual test answers that were unethically obtained and shared (breaking NDA). All of the parents’ efforts trying to cheat the system were one of the reasons why they changed the admissions process. [/quote] You still haven't provided any proof of anything. Please cite a news article or something reputable showing that actual test answers were used and NDAs were broken. Likewise, please cite something showing that cheating was a reason that they changed the admissions process. I have read things indicating that the school board was afraid that affluence lead to an unfair advantage, but I haven't read anything specifically about cheating. [/quote] You are clearly not reading any of my posts. I’ve posted much of this. Go back and re-read the current threads. You’re too lazy to read all of the million old threads covering this and too lazy to read recent posts. And yet you continue to whine about “proof”. Seems like you’re just being oppositional at this point. [/quote] People posting stuff on a message board does not equal proof. You can't keep citing anonymous posts on dcum as proof of anything. You still haven't anywhere posted an actual news article from a reputable source directly stating any of the things you've claimed. Once again, post right here. If you can't post a link to a real news article corroborating anything you've claimed, then you are de facto admitting that the proof does not exist. [/quote] I haven’t “claimed” anything about news articles. “I’m too lazy to read the old threads so none of that ever happened.” :lol: [/quote] Old threads = lots of randos saying stuff that hasn't been vetted. I mean, by your logic, the same person posting the same thing over and over somehow equals proof of something.[/quote] If you want links there are links. [/quote] Yes. I want links. Post them right here, in response to this post. I know you'll come up with some excuse as to why you won't rather than ponying up with the links. You've made it abundantly clear that you have no links to anything other than old dcum threads. :lol: [/quote] Here you go. You can see other references to Curie in other TJ Vents posts as well if you do a simple search - explaining how students had to give up their clubs in order to do Curie and the like. https://www.facebook.com/tjvents/posts/pfbid0jKy4hotXF8AxKwfHm2MAVi7e2yYoCqtrTTXPYsszAdQg6uMoTmReMidqyM1mpu9Bl[/quote] Thanks for posting something. I'm still not sure how much weight to give something anonymously posted on social media, especially when the poster didn't personally attend Curie or claim to see the test. In the comments, there weren't any kids who corroborated seeing the test at their prep center.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics