Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "APS Elementary Planning Mtg at Swanson - Option 1 in, Option 2 out, McKinley Moms out of contro"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat. [/quote] I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.[/quote] McKinley is already farther away for many in southwest arlington in particular. Tuckahoe would make ATS even less accessible.[/quote] +1. Between that and the capacity issue, I fail to see why ATS to a Tuckahoe is better for the APS system as a whole than ATS to McKinley.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
