Anonymous wrote:
Don't poke the Tuckahoe bear. The guy who lives right by Tuckahoe will go head to head with McKrazy.
Anonymous wrote:Just catching up on this and I don’t follow. Don’t the McKinley moms realize that Ashlawn isn’t going to actually add a net of 200 seats? They are moving hundreds from the Ballston area out of Ashlawn. What am I missing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat.
I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.
McKinley is already farther away for many in southwest arlington in particular. Tuckahoe would make ATS even less accessible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat.
I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.
Anonymous wrote:I thought Tuckahoe couldn’t fit ATS. Would they shrink it? No K the first year?
Anonymous wrote:I thought Tuckahoe couldn’t fit ATS. Would they shrink it? No K the first year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat.
I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.
Vaporware, you gotta love it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat.
I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat.
I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.
Tuckahoe is Metro accessible and has great bus service on Lee Highway. But in the last round APS said no option schools in the corners of the county...has that changed?
Don't poke the Tuckahoe bear. The guy who lives right by Tuckahoe will go head to head with McKrazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat.
I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.
Tuckahoe is Metro accessible and has great bus service on Lee Highway. But in the last round APS said no option schools in the corners of the county...has that changed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McKrazy said at last night's meeting that they were going to make them public. The way she said it made it sound like a threat.
I've seen the McKinley analysis. It looks solid from someone who does analytics. Tuckahoe with minimal walk zone really should be the new home of ATS and not McKinley. I hope they do release the analysis as it's more analytical than what APS has provided. I'm not associated with McKinley.