Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Hardy IB Population"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]desirability for of Hardy for high SES IB families with choices is a function of school leadership, school curriculum/offerings/physicalplant etc, number of feeder students, and number of "true" IB students. All four matter, and the debate is about how much. Prob of choosing H - A*(sl) + B(SC) + C(F%) + D(IB%) Where SL is a summary of school leadership factors, SC is a summary of school offering factors, F% is % from feeders and IB% is a true IB percentage (SC) is a function of SL , lagged. Feeder percentage is a function of SL and SC, also lagged. IB% is a function of SL, SC, and F%, all lagged. SC is ALSO a function of feeder% and IB% as those changes will impact curriculum offerings. IB% is also a function of lagged IB% (IE previous years IB%) The interrelationships are why schools flip. The lags are why it takes time. SL has improved with Pride. SC appears to have improved significantly. Feeder% is clearly up, though perhaps a bit more slowly than forecast a year ago. IB% is likely up but there is no data yet. All these should result in the 2015 feeder and IB% going up even further. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics