Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Why do elite SLACs and Small R1s value athletic recruits"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]University of Texas (Austin) has 581 athletes — and 39,600 undergrads. Williams College has 680 athletes — and 2,100 undergrads. [/quote] I think you meant 691 athletes at UT Austin, and I wonder how much you know about the costs of and emphasis on the mens’ football program at Texas? [/quote] At least that brings in money and has a school spirit benefit. The campus of Williams does not go into a frenzy when the lacrosse team is playing.[/quote] That's because half the student body at Williams College is on the lacrosse team. In summing up this thread, it appears that Williams College & MIT are jock schools.[/quote] Well, let’s see: MIT 17% athletes Williams College 33% athletes (38% men) I think MIT needs to expand their male enrollment by devoting another 20% of its admissions slots to athletes; that way it can be more like Williams, and — no doubt — attract smarter students. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
