Reply to Just in time for Pride Month…

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Just in time for Pride Month…"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It was a very poor decision in the first place to name a ship after a man who had sexual relationships with underage teens while in his 30s. Randy Shilts outed Harvey Milk as what he was. It is plain stupid to suggest, as whitewashing liberals have, that the well-respected gay historian and activist Shilts, who apparently thought there was nothing wrong with Milk's proclivities, was lying about this. The fact that a pedophile was shot for his sexuality doesn't make him a hero in my book.[/quote]
That’s funny, because Pedophile Donald Trump was shot in the ear and you idiots made him a hero over that.  [/quote]
Are you suggesting Milk's pedophilia isn't disqualifying because Trump won? Just say you support child rape and spare the irrelevant prattle about Trump. [/quote]

Trump is a child rapist who is a 34 time convicted felon with multiple bankrupticies and hundreds of millions in civil fines, who was never shot in the ear. You will not win this, because there is no low lower than Trump and this administration.[/quote]
I'm not trying to win the "which pedophile should I defend" game. That's your lane. Normal people whose moral compass hasn't been compromised by partisanship and fringe sexual ideas know that no pedophile deserves to be honored and one pedophile getting away with his actions doesn't mean we should let the other one slide too. You are creepy as hell.[/quote]
DP. I despise Trump and damn near everything he stands for with all my fiber, but I am in agreement with this partisanship regarding inappropriate sexual behavior. There should be no whataboutism in this matter. Hopefully the future will judge Trump accordingly and he will receive no favorable acknowledgment and honors. Until that time comes, there is no need to honor a man who history has shown engaged in sexual relations with a minor. Anyone who disagrees should close their eyes and imagine if that 16-year old was their child have sexual relations with a 30+ year old person, male or female. Sounds like grooming. [/quote]
+1000. It was absolutely grooming and molestation. The gulf between those ages is HUGE developmentally and experience-wise.

Harvey Milk had been [i]out of college[/i] longer than the 16 year old's oldest memory and likely longer than the 16 year old had been alive.

The 16 year old would have [i]started[/i] puberty no more than 5 years earlier and possibly just a couple years before Harvey Milk started using him sexually.

Any adult having sex with a kid who was in 5th Grade just five years ago is a predator. No ifs, ands, or buts.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics