Reply to 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Loomis does as well[/quote]
Culver, img, case western, hill, Taft, Salisbury, Deerfield. There s more and they should only play each other. [/quote]

Yeah because no DMV schools have 19yr old players or freshman who drive to practice. [/quote]

No dmv school has a varsity team then another post grad team of only 18-20 year olds. Typical defense of the reclass academy. Pretty cool the graduating Landon fogo could play dmv teams next year again as a 5th year.   Seems fair. [/quote]

No defense, just calling out hypocrisy. Taking your points to their illogical conclusion, no private should schedule a public team. Or any team not rated within 5 points of them on laxnumbers.com. Stop whining about a reality that DMV schools helped foster. It is what it is.[/quote]

Trying to tie together a full team of 18-20 year olds playing against a team of 16-19 year olds isn't even in the realm of public v privates. The publics have any number of kids born prior to September 1.

You are correct in that publics and privates should choose to play each other in specific matchups to try and make the game more competitive or with the understanding the game is more of a scrimmage to get bench players significant playing time. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics