Reply to Cuomo 2028?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Cuomo 2028?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No. Absolutely not. He wasn't "Me Tooed."He was rightfully shooed out because he harassed women. There are no shortage of good candidates. We don't need to go with the another bad actor[/quote]
OP here. Yes, I know he's a bad guy from the moral standpoint. I am not talking about that. I am talking about whether or not he can win. [/quote]

And I'm saying who cares? We will just end up with another corrupt sexist in office. Seriously. Eff that guy when there are tons of other winners. [/quote]

+1000  2028 will be a repeat of 2020 and 2024 when the incumbent party is at a huge disadvantage due to the sitting president being very unpopular. The incumbent party never wins in this situation. Dems need to take advantage of this 2028 election gift with an elite candidate who is capable of winning a second term in 2032. Cuomo isn't that elite candidate just as much as Biden wasn't that elite candidate. [/quote]

Who is the MOST elite candidate at the moment? I agree with you that we don’t even know the name of our next Obama yet (or we barely know it) and the right person could emerge from a fair primary.  But, hypothetically, if we knew the DNC would decide, and they’d take you advice, and it had to happen today, who are the types of people who would make your short list?[/quote]

I've always been a fan of multi-term state governors being on the short list of potential POTUS candidates. They have the most relevant experience. Dems have a few of those from swing states (being from a swing state adds some mustard to a candidate's resume but it isn't a must have). I would have thought redneck Clinton had no chance on the big stage until he actually got on the big stage. It's impossible to tell if a candidate has the necessary likability and presidential leadership prowess until they are campaigning. Primary debates can be very effective in separating the cream of the crop from the also-rans (primary debates serve an actual purpose unlike general election debates that have only served the purpose of embarrassing the country in recent elections). [/quote]

Yeah, I didn’t think you’d be willing to say a name.  It’s slim pickins on the blue team these days[/quote]

Thanks to Trump being the sitting POTUS, we'll have another easy election victory in 2028 just like we had in 2020. We just need someone that has the talent and fitness to still be viable in 2032 so we don't get Bidened again.[/quote]

If ONLY you had the courage to brainstorm a few names, we could get started.  But no.  Let’s assume that the donors and superdelegates lose interest in politics and money and just leave it up to the people this year.  Don’t worry, you won’t have to nominate anyone.  You can just wait for the winner to emerge from the new fair process that you won’t demand.  And the our victory will be automatic.  History says so.  Anyway, people are LOVING the Democratic Party these days.  We may nit have any attractive candidates, but at least we’ve got a great party brand. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics