Reply to Why the MAHA obsession with chemicals in food, but not the environment?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Why the MAHA obsession with chemicals in food, but not the environment?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What about informed consent and proper dosing?  Why does tooth decay get this weird special status as the one disease that deserves to have the drug dumped in the water instead of properly measured and administered by dentists, doctors, and parents?[/quote]

Move somewhere else if you don't want it. Buy it at CVS, they sell fluoride-free water. I, for one, prefer to keep it in my drinking water as a mother to two kids. I do not want to go back to the first half of the 1900s when we did not have it in our water, but if you want to go back in time to a lower life span, have at it.

There are fair questions to ask - making sure we look at the dose in our water in combination with using fluoride toothpaste, and whether the local region water supply has sufficient fluoride naturally or not.

To be clear, PFAs in our water - I am far more worried about that. Are you familiar with the research on PFA impact on our health? If you want to worry about something, that would be the biggest concern and the MAHA movement is blatantly ignoring it.
[quote]

Every administration in the PFA era has ignored it.  Every Democrat at FDA and EPA has ignored it.  Yes I’m worried about it.  And yes I agree that MAHA won’t end up prioritizing it correctly.  But MAHA is the closest we’ve seen in 50 years to caring about the human impacts of corporate toxins.  If you care about PFAs you are better off with MAHA than with Admiral Rachel Levine or any  health czar or administration in the PFA era.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics