Reply to Michael Moore expects large female turnout on Abortion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Michael Moore expects large female turnout on Abortion"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The sad thing is that Harris can't do squat about abortion, while Trump can't do squat about the economy (and that's the best case - it's quite likely his tariffs will tank it). He does have the power to do something about the border - his executive orders will reduce the number or migrants simply by making the US an unappealing destination - but as we learned in 2021 that all goes out the window once he leaves office. If he truly wants a border solution that outlasts him he'll need to work with Congress, something he's incapable of doing.[/quote]

Trump already did more than squat by selecting the correct justices after McConnell blockaded the Obama Administration from choosing Scalia’s successor.

Harris in turn can do more than squat by seeking Judicial Branch reform. One option would be to achieve legislation to expand the Supreme Court, or to impose term limits. Another option, however, would be to seek transparency over Judicial Branch operations beyond the Supreme Court. It’s transparency and openness that scares Chief Justice Roberts.

Provisions that could be passed into law include:

1. Extension of civil rights to employees of the Federal Judiciary.

2. Mandating and funding on-demand free download of all records currently filed with the court on PACER, save for those limited records that are placed under judicial seal.

3. Installation of an Office of the Inspector General for the Federal Judiciary, answerable to Congress rather than the Chief Justice or the Judicial Conference of the United States. This is the policy-making arm responsible for budget requests, management of probation officers, management of publicly-funded defense attorneys, and support services for the Federal courts.

4. Extension of FOIA for all matters that fall under the Judicial Conference.

5. Public notice of all members of the numerous advisory committees to the Judicial Conference, not just the Advisory Committees on Rules and Procedures.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics