Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "What if Sandusky is innocent?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][i][b]S said he showered naked with young boys. S said he touched the legs of naked little boys while showering. S said he horseplayed with little boys in the shower. [/b][/i] Finally, S said, but I never had sex with the boys. OP, come back when you can add 3 +1=4 and not 2.[/quote] Since when are these crimes?[/quote] Gosh, either you are dense or you may actually be a follower and participant of child sex trafficking. It is a big, organized and lucrative business. Your statement speaks volumes. EEEEEWWWWW. [/quote] They're not crimes. I'm not sure why you're calling the PP a child trafficker. Sandusky was probably advised on his answers by his attorney before the interview.[/quote] Really? Wasn't there a big case talked about here on DCUM where a teacher's husband got arrested for playing ping pong naked with other people's little boys? I would think that getting naked with, and then touching, young boys who are in you care while you are working with them, would be indecent exposure at the least? [/quote] Lawyers should feel free to jump in on this one, but my understanding is that indecent exposure requires someone to be naked where it is not appropriate. The shower and locker room are appropriate places to be naked. People don't usually get naked to play table tennis.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics