Reply to CDC reports super spreader event at hockey game

Forum Index » Sports General Discussion

Reply to "CDC reports super spreader event at hockey game"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well, let's get back to that soooper scary soooper spreader event happening in New Hampshire. The governor shuts down an activity all over the state for 158 presumptive cases over 60 days across 23 organizations. So. about 2.5 cases a day for 23 orgs over 60 days. This is also for presumptive positives which haven't been confirmed and where most have likely turned into false-positives.

New Hampshire tests at about 7000 a day. Just like in the Maine hockey case, which has since gone silent, is that .8-4% of those tests will turn out a false positive. 70 - 280 of those tests are turning out presumptive positives which will most likely turn out false positives. Even with that, New Hampshire hasn't turned into cv19 central.

Here is what the New Hampshire health department reports and these are the same numbers used by any cv19 reporting site in the world
New Cases
10/18 - 57
10/17 - 70
10/16 - 109
10/15 - 88
10/14 - 80
10/13 (date of story and where the sooper spreading should be noticeable) - 69

Whoops, all of these tests fall into the range of faulty test results. Even those that snuck through could be a confirmed person testing again until they go negative or they could be unrelated like a teacher at a college. The sooper scary hockey OUTBREAK is a bust.

[/quote]

You seem to keep claiming over and over with no evidence that all positive tests are false positives or people retesting.  It’s weird and utterly unconvincing.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics