Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL Mid-Atantlic"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]ECNL added 15 clubs this spring. Good clubs to be sure but that is also 270 more players per age group. That is nearly 2000 kids per age group. Again the entire league was just 900 kids. The league essentially, in one spring added nearly a third of what was once it’s entire player pool. It is now just a showcasing platform that for most kids is no longer particularly difficult to make a team anymore. [/quote] Again Again Again You lack experience and want a system that would cost $12,000 per family and trips on plans to play league games. Not only is it stupid, its wrong and not sustainable. On top of that, a closed elite system with limited resources to the vast population would only shrink the pool. You are under the impression that only 700 girls in the nation are worth developing and that development should be paid for by the parents at the same cost as a private school. You don't understand RAE, puberty, ups and downs, etc. Almost 100 percent of elite teams don't look anything like they did when they were U9-13. You have a lot to learn. How old is your kid. Tell us about your skin in the game. Tell us about your experience with navigating US soccer. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics