Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "GOP chairman = terrorist?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You left out broader context. You might also be unaware that about half the population in Virginia now lives in gun "sanctuary" counties, and that some of these counties are starting government sanctioned militias. All if this started not just from Del Levine's bill, but from fellow delegates who wanted the state police to go door to door and confiscate weapons. You have a lot of people who are incredibly upset by heated rhetoric. I can only hope cooler heads prevail as Del Levine's legislation is submitted again next year. [/quote] You think there's a broader context that justifies this? Please elaborate, with more than, "people are upset." Also, gun sanctuary counties are meaningless. [/quote] I'm merely explaining that there is considerable pushback and county government so angry that they are willing to deputize and train militias in response to fears that the national guard was going to be called out to take firearms. That was actually a position advocated by some Virgina delegates and eventually answered by the VA national guard. Apparently you weren't following the 75 page thread last month on the gun lobby day. You now have a lot of newly energised people who are more inclined to vote GOP next time. [/quote] So, to be clear, you do *not* think that there is a "broader context" that justifies this behavior? And you concede, that the "gun sanctuary county" nonsense is meaningless? [/quote] No I don't think the sanctuary county stuff is meaningless if you have a sherrif in that county that won't cooperate with state level enforcement or a Commonwealth attorney for enforcement. Not if you have a sherrif or county that has started a militia for that purpose. Those things have happened already in a few rural counties. I can't concern the point when armed groups exist authorized by local government. [img]https://i.redd.it/75ac7871twg41.png[/img] I think cooler heads are needed. [/quote] Yeah, that is flat out treason.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics