Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to clarify I am outraged by that idiot with his weapon but don't believe anyone will do anything about it. Has he been charged with anything?

Nope, cops left him alone. If cops in anti-gun Arlington left him alone, then there really must have been nothing to it.

It didn’t happen in Arlington, dipshit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You left out broader context.

You might also be unaware that about half the population in Virginia now lives in gun "sanctuary" counties, and that some of these counties are starting government sanctioned militias. All if this started not just from Del Levine's bill, but from fellow delegates who wanted the state police to go door to door and confiscate weapons.

You have a lot of people who are incredibly upset by heated rhetoric.

I can only hope cooler heads prevail as Del Levine's legislation is submitted again next year.

You think there's a broader context that justifies this? Please elaborate, with more than, "people are upset."

Also, gun sanctuary counties are meaningless.

I'm merely explaining that there is considerable pushback and county government so angry that they are willing to deputize and train militias in response to fears that the national guard was going to be called out to take firearms. That was actually a position advocated by some Virgina delegates and eventually answered by the VA national guard.

Apparently you weren't following the 75 page thread last month on the gun lobby day.

You now have a lot of newly energised people who are more inclined to vote GOP next time.

So, to be clear, you do *not* think that there is a "broader context" that justifies this behavior?

And you concede, that the "gun sanctuary county" nonsense is meaningless?

No I don't think the sanctuary county stuff is meaningless if you have a sherrif in that county that won't cooperate with state level enforcement or a Commonwealth attorney for enforcement. Not if you have a sherrif or county that has started a militia for that purpose.

Those things have happened already in a few rural counties. I can't concern the point when armed groups exist authorized by local government.



I think cooler heads are needed.

Yeah, that is flat out treason.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to clarify I am outraged by that idiot with his weapon but don't believe anyone will do anything about it. Has he been charged with anything?

Nope, cops left him alone. If cops in anti-gun Arlington left him alone, then there really must have been nothing to it.

It didn’t happen in Arlington, dipshit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to clarify I am outraged by that idiot with his weapon but don't believe anyone will do anything about it. Has he been charged with anything?

Nope, cops left him alone. If cops in anti-gun Arlington left him alone, then there really must have been nothing to it.

Anonymous wrote:I want to clarify I am outraged by that idiot with his weapon but don't believe anyone will do anything about it. Has he been charged with anything?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, you idiots, the local police have a tank and we have the biggest, baddest army in the world. If the government ever decides to come for your stupid assault rifle, it will. There may have been a moment when armed citizenry could defend themselves against a tyrannical government but that moment was more than a century ago.

You’re much more Waco than Revolution.

The government burned children to death in Waco

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Stop justifying stalking. Picketing someone’s private home in that manner is illegal.

I'm not one of the gun nuts but pp you are wrong about the fact that what the person is doing is illegal. It isn't. If they aren't on private property, they can legally hang out there. It is not illegal.

You are absolutely wrong. Picketing a private residence is a class 3 misdemeanor in Virginia. Take a look at Va Code 18.2 - 419. The fine is $500 per day, and the resident of the home is specifically authorized to sue you in civil court for punitive damages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, you idiots, the local police have a tank and we have the biggest, baddest army in the world. If the government ever decides to come for your stupid assault rifle, it will. There may have been a moment when armed citizenry could defend themselves against a tyrannical government but that moment was more than a century ago.

You’re much more Waco than Revolution.

The government burned children to death in Waco

You are defending the parents at Waco?

Any good parent would have gotten their kids away from that mess and not armed them. And The Davidians started fires, most of the deaths were from smoke and fire. While there were mistakes on the government's side, children dying was absolutely a consequence of their insane parents. The Davidians were a cult and a dangerous one at that.

Signed A Gun Owner.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize there were kids there, no matter who put them there. Seems like the government should have acted with more caution when dealing with crazies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You left out broader context.

You might also be unaware that about half the population in Virginia now lives in gun "sanctuary" counties, and that some of these counties are starting government sanctioned militias. All if this started not just from Del Levine's bill, but from fellow delegates who wanted the state police to go door to door and confiscate weapons.

You have a lot of people who are incredibly upset by heated rhetoric.

I can only hope cooler heads prevail as Del Levine's legislation is submitted again next year.

You think there's a broader context that justifies this? Please elaborate, with more than, "people are upset."

Also, gun sanctuary counties are meaningless.

I'm merely explaining that there is considerable pushback and county government so angry that they are willing to deputize and train militias in response to fears that the national guard was going to be called out to take firearms. That was actually a position advocated by some Virgina delegates and eventually answered by the VA national guard.

Apparently you weren't following the 75 page thread last month on the gun lobby day.

You now have a lot of newly energised people who are more inclined to vote GOP next time.

So, to be clear, you do *not* think that there is a "broader context" that justifies this behavior?

And you concede, that the "gun sanctuary county" nonsense is meaningless?

No I don't think the sanctuary county stuff is meaningless if you have a sherrif in that county that won't cooperate with state level enforcement or a Commonwealth attorney for enforcement. Not if you have a sherrif or county that has started a militia for that purpose.

Those things have happened already in a few rural counties. I can't concern the point when armed groups exist authorized by local government.



I think cooler heads are needed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, you idiots, the local police have a tank and we have the biggest, baddest army in the world. If the government ever decides to come for your stupid assault rifle, it will. There may have been a moment when armed citizenry could defend themselves against a tyrannical government but that moment was more than a century ago.

You’re much more Waco than Revolution.

The government burned children to death in Waco

You are defending the parents at Waco?

Any good parent would have gotten their kids away from that mess and not armed them. And The Davidians started fires, most of the deaths were from smoke and fire. While there were mistakes on the government's side, children dying was absolutely a consequence of their insane parents. The Davidians were a cult and a dangerous one at that.

Signed A Gun Owner.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, you idiots, the local police have a tank and we have the biggest, baddest army in the world. If the government ever decides to come for your stupid assault rifle, it will. There may have been a moment when armed citizenry could defend themselves against a tyrannical government but that moment was more than a century ago.

You’re much more Waco than Revolution.

The government burned children to death in Waco

You are defending the parents at Waco?

Any good parent would have gotten their kids away from that mess and not armed them. And The Davidians started fires, most of the deaths were from smoke and fire. While there were mistakes on the government's side, children dying was absolutely a consequence of their insane parents. The Davidians were a cult and a dangerous one at that.

Signed A Gun Owner.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, you idiots, the local police have a tank and we have the biggest, baddest army in the world. If the government ever decides to come for your stupid assault rifle, it will. There may have been a moment when armed citizenry could defend themselves against a tyrannical government but that moment was more than a century ago.

You’re much more Waco than Revolution.

The government burned children to death in Waco