Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "What do you consider rich vs UMC?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I base it on quintiles and using HHI Are you ready for a reality check DCUM Poor 0-20% under 22.5k LMC 20-40% 22.5k to 53.7k MC 40-60% 53.7 to 95.8k UMC is 60-80% 95.8 to 162.6 Rich is 80% 162.6+ A more DCUM version of this is below. Consider this a college graduate HHI chart Poor 0-20% under 49.7k LMC 20-40% 49.7k to 94k MC 40-60% 94k to 146.8k UMC is 60-80% 146.8k to 258.2k Rich is 80% 258.2k+ [/quote] Flawed, because rich is not the top 20% but maybe the top 1%. I would argue, it is about comfort level: Poor: do not know where the next meal is coming from. Income < 30K, assets ~0. LMC/WC: one paycheck away from disaster. Income: 30-75K assets less than 5K MC: Some safety net, but rarely eat out. 3-6 months from disaster. Most of the assets in the home. (Income :75K-150K), non-housing assets less than 50K UMC: Money is tracked, but there is a strong safety net. College is funded; retirement is funded. (Income > 150K; assets less than 15 mil) UC: No need to work. Money works for you, provides more income than jobs. Net Worth>15 mil (500K income from money) In my life, I have been poor/homeless. I had no income, and $600 to my name. I had no safety net, and there were no jobs. I was an unfunded grad student during a recession. I am now, by my definition, UMC; income ~ 180K; assets ~1.6 million.[/quote] DP.. also ^ those %iles are national and does not account for col. $100K in a rural area means you are living UMC. In DC, SF, NYC.. it's lower middle class.[/quote] lol top numbers are DC and bottom numbers are ward 3 try again and yes rich is the top 20% sorry not sorry you might want to join the republican party there chief[/quote] [b]In places like SF, median income is close to $200K[/b] and considered "middle class". https://www.sfgate.com/expensive-san-francisco/article/SF-household-income-192k-middle-class-median-13637536.php In DC, it's $75K. In MoCo, it's about $100K In Arlington, it's $100K So yes, $100K is not "rich" in these high col areas. [/quote] LOL that's...not what that article says.[/quote] You're right.. it's even worse... [quote] In San Francisco, where the median household income is $96,265, the middle income range is $64,177 to an eye-popping $192,530.... Fremont, which was has a middle class income range of between $81,461 to $244,382.[/quote] The range is based on area within the city. But I can tell you having lived in that area, you are not going to live like middle class if you earn that little and want to own a home in a decent school district there.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics