Reply to Boundary violation or no?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Boundary violation or no? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^ I see nothing that says he agreed to the no speaking “arrangement “ in the OP scenario. He was also there first. If you have a restraining order on someone, you can’t show up somewhere and demand they leave. [/quote]

Op never said she demanded he leave (unless she said that in one of the follow ups?).

[b]If op asked him to not talk to her and he went along with that (Which it sounds like he did) then addressing her kid when she's with their kid is obnoxious.[/b] [/quote]

That wasn't laid out on page 19, article 63 & exhibit F of the code of conduct of James's moms self imposed rulebook.
She never said anything about her kid, just herself.

Is he now supposed to be a mind reader as well??

Did he also mischievously twirl his handlebar moustache and cackle wryly, while saying "Hi James"?

That beast!

By the way, the chances he was being obnoxious are ridiculous, and it's probably because it came naturally to him & he didn't over think the interaction nine thousand times.

Other adjectives besides obnoxious that are more likely are considerate (to a 3 year old), NON dramatic or I don't know... MATURE.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics