Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ I see nothing that says he agreed to the no speaking “arrangement “ in the OP scenario. He was also there first. If you have a restraining order on someone, you can’t show up somewhere and demand they leave.
Op never said she demanded he leave (unless she said that in one of the follow ups?).
If op asked him to not talk to her and he went along with that (Which it sounds like he did) then addressing her kid when she's with their kid is obnoxious.
And FWIW imo if one person asks another person after a breakup to not contact them and that person refuses I think they're engaging in borderline abusive behavior.
Of course no one can control another person but a normal well adjusted person doesn't intentionally shove their face in the face of another person who doesn't want to speak to them. Just because it's not illegal doesn't mean you're not an ahole.
So. Much. Drama & irrational instability.
You & James' mom sound perfect for one another.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I guess the flood gates are open, but if respondents could refrain from name-calling, it would be appreciated. This is a sincere question.
Ex and I ended amiably, but things recently turned a corner and I cannot accept any communication at all. My thought is that he could have smiled at my kid - it would have communicated something affirming without my having to know. I didn't even look at ex, just saw that he was there as as I approached. It felt terribly awkward.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Am I *really* being unreasonable here? Was what my ex did *totally* acceptable? If I'm wrong I'll take it, but clearly I have an issue, which is why I'm approaching the DCUM hive mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ I see nothing that says he agreed to the no speaking “arrangement “ in the OP scenario. He was also there first. If you have a restraining order on someone, you can’t show up somewhere and demand they leave.
Op never said she demanded he leave (unless she said that in one of the follow ups?).
If op asked him to not talk to her and he went along with that (Which it sounds like he did) then addressing her kid when she's with their kid is obnoxious.
And FWIW imo if one person asks another person after a breakup to not contact them and that person refuses I think they're engaging in borderline abusive behavior.
Of course no one can control another person but a normal well adjusted person doesn't intentionally shove their face in the face of another person who doesn't want to speak to them. Just because it's not illegal doesn't mean you're not an ahole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ I see nothing that says he agreed to the no speaking “arrangement “ in the OP scenario. He was also there first. If you have a restraining order on someone, you can’t show up somewhere and demand they leave.
Op never said she demanded he leave (unless she said that in one of the follow ups?).
If op asked him to not talk to her and he went along with that (Which it sounds like he did) then addressing her kid when she's with their kid is obnoxious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry you are in pain.
He did nothing wrong.
You're reacting because of your unresolved and painful feelings.
I am curious: why, if the breakup was amicable, did things change later to this extent?
+ 1. Agree with this poster.
In all likelihood him addressing your kid was innocent. Hope you get over this situation soon.
Ignore the nutty posters on this forum. Most are class A b*tches that spend all day picking others apart.
I think OP is being a little over the top but you don't think he was effing with her?
Changing the roles a bit. I divorce and my exH (who I have a strict no speaking arrangement with) comes in to a cafe with his sister. If I say hi to sister in his presence I am clearly bringing attention to myself. In a situation where me and exH have explicitly laid out no contact this feels obnoxious. Honestly same would go for a friend. Not technically WRONG but let's be real not innocent.
This is magnified with the kid imo because the relationship clearly has to end and that makes things difficult.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, OP. I think you're being unreasonable. I don't know if he was being passive-aggressive or just felt that it would be rude not to at least say "hi" to someone that he knows. Either way, it shouldn't be that big of a deal. If this guy is so bad that you cannot tolerate him even briefly acknowledging your presence -- or even the presence of other people in your presence -- then get a restraining order. Otherwise, chill out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ I see nothing that says he agreed to the no speaking “arrangement “ in the OP scenario. He was also there first. If you have a restraining order on someone, you can’t show up somewhere and demand they leave.
Op never said she demanded he leave (unless she said that in one of the follow ups?).
If op asked him to not talk to her and he went along with that (Which it sounds like he did) then addressing her kid when she's with their kid is obnoxious.
Anonymous wrote:^ I see nothing that says he agreed to the no speaking “arrangement “ in the OP scenario. He was also there first. If you have a restraining order on someone, you can’t show up somewhere and demand they leave.