Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "PARCC Scores for Charters"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We went with a language immersion charter for 2 main reasons: (1) our IB school is terrible and we didn't want to move; and (2) language immersion. I do wish the PARCC scores were better, but I am not overly concerned about them at this point. I am not a fan of "teaching to the test" and while it may have a time and a place, it's not something I'd like for my child if given the choice. Having said all of this, if it turns out that our charter isn't a good fit for my child or we start to have concerns, we will reevaluate. [/quote] I don't think you can explain the PARCC score differences by claiming certain schools are "teaching to the test." The test measures basic proficiency levels in reading/english and math. Yes, you can teach good test taking skills, but if a majority of the students are doing poorly I would question the schools approach and academics. And to another PP point, if all I wanted my child to learn was what I could teach him at home then he'd be home schooled. [/quote] This is not true - you can absolutely explain some PARCC score differences by schools teaching to the test. Look at the test material and at the day to day experiences in those schools - time devoted to science and social studies and topics not tested, time spent doing practice tests, time talking about test-taking strategies, and more - and see for yourself. [/quote] I'm not totally sure about this. Based on my LIMITED experience, the DCPS we looked at is a year ahead of the HRCS in terms of teaching literacy and math, so there are real curriculum differences. I don't think that's "teaching to the test," but rather a focus on reading and math as the #1 priorities, starting in PK3. I also don't think the test-taking strategies stuff takes all that long, but may make a big difference if it's neglected. I imagine that the HRCS are going to start the test-taking skill work this year, so we should see if that has any impact soon. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics