Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infants, Toddlers, & Preschoolers
Reply to "At what age is it unacceptable for a kid to wear diapers"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think Americans are generally the last in the world to potty train LOL All the kids I knew overseas were trained by 1.5 like clockwork. The fact that we waited till 2.5 horrified everybody. Methinks by 3 it's high time. Our PK3 requires children to be fully trained.[/quote] Non- American. This is bullshit. [/quote] American with lots of non-American family, and no, it's not BS... but it depends on what kind of "non-American" we're talking about. Perhaps Americans aren't the very last in the world to train, but they are later than most of the world's population. Is this because they "have to" train early because they use cloth? Maybe. It's related. But more generally, it is a social/cultural thing. That's the crux of the OP. What does "unacceptable" mean? What it really means is "what is [i]socially [/i]unacceptable in your culture or community." Because it's not so much biological, as we can see in many cultures and historically, where kids tend to be done or mostly done PT by, yeah-- about 1.5 in most cases. My grandparents (born in the 20s) are appalled at any kid still using diapers after their 2nd birthday-- latest. My non-American family born in the 60s-80s allow up to maybe 2.5 before they think it's totally unacceptable. But my American contemporaries don't start batting an eye until about 3.25 or 3.5, and don't really draw the line until 4. So, if you're asking in a mostly white American context in 2017, especially in a middle class+ context? And including pullups, really meaning "not in underwear?" Then yeah, I'd say for kids without special needs, it starts becoming socially unacceptable around 3.5. But there's nothing universal or immutable about that. Nor, really, is it anyone's business. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics