Reply to Bridgerton, Season 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Bridgerton, Season 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Because I love the time period, I tried watching the first few episodes and couldn't get past how fake and unhistorical it was. It is soapy but calling it regency romance is really stretching it. It's obviously popular so my opinion carries no weight  :lol: [/quote]

I’m sort of hate watching too. Lol. I don’t understand the hype but it’s keeping me busy and occupied. [/quote]

Okay, I wrote this after finishing Season 1 and watching only 2 episodes of Season 2. I have since devoured it and I will say this second season was far superior. I don’t know if I think it deserves a cult following. However, I appreciated the lack of sex and the fact there was actually more building of the characters this season.  I will watch Season 3 because I’m interested in the other siblings. [/quote]

Agree Season 2 is better (and I liked Season 1 fine). I think the story was much more interesting and I think the show benefits from a more restrained approach to sex -- there is more dramatic tension because it is more chaste (sorry). Plus I don't have to worry about my neighbors wondering if I'm watching porn when I watch Bridgerton episodes late at night!

I also think there was better balance between the primary and secondary storylines this year. Last year I didn't find the secondary storylines memorable at all, and this year I found the stuff with Eloise, Penelope, the rest of the Featheringtons, and the Queen much more compelling. And they did a good job of tying them all in with the core plot line with the Sharmas. Just a better written season overall.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics