Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't find the sex in Season 1 sexy, to be honest, at least not the Daphne/Simon stuff. I mean one of the sex scenes was an assault and definitely not sexy, but even before then, eh? So I didn't miss those extra sex scenes.
Ditto this. I love a good sex scene but season 1 was so not sexy. It was just robot or rabbit sex.
I much preferred season 2.
Anthony is mind-blowingly attractive in my book. Different tastes for different women but he is about as hot as a man can get IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Finished Season 2 and thought it far superior to Season 1. Both were good, but the slow burn chemistry in Season 2 was ridiculously hot.
Ugh I did not like it. They were just like…smelling each other. Weirdly.
Anonymous wrote:Finished Season 2 and thought it far superior to Season 1. Both were good, but the slow burn chemistry in Season 2 was ridiculously hot.
Anonymous wrote:I didn't find the sex in Season 1 sexy, to be honest, at least not the Daphne/Simon stuff. I mean one of the sex scenes was an assault and definitely not sexy, but even before then, eh? So I didn't miss those extra sex scenes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I love the time period, I tried watching the first few episodes and couldn't get past how fake and unhistorical it was. It is soapy but calling it regency romance is really stretching it. It's obviously popular so my opinion carries no weight![]()
I’m sort of hate watching too. Lol. I don’t understand the hype but it’s keeping me busy and occupied.
Okay, I wrote this after finishing Season 1 and watching only 2 episodes of Season 2. I have since devoured it and I will say this second season was far superior. I don’t know if I think it deserves a cult following. However, I appreciated the lack of sex and the fact there was actually more building of the characters this season. I will watch Season 3 because I’m interested in the other siblings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I love the time period, I tried watching the first few episodes and couldn't get past how fake and unhistorical it was. It is soapy but calling it regency romance is really stretching it. It's obviously popular so my opinion carries no weight![]()
I’m sort of hate watching too. Lol. I don’t understand the hype but it’s keeping me busy and occupied.
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the second episode. It's okay, and overall I like the story more than the absurd "I will dramatically pull out of my twelve year old looking bride to stick it to my dead father" thing from last season. But I'm already so TIRED of it. Eloise is a feminist and doesn't want to do any of this. We get it. Kate doesn't approve of Anthony for Edwina. WE GET IT. I don't know if I can stand another six hours of this.
Also, is Kate super tall or is Edwina super short? I know that they share only one parent, but the height differential is ridiculous.
Since everyone is so hung up on what they look like, I actually think the moms are the best looking women in the cast. Mrs. Sharma and Mrs. Bridgerton are both really pretty. Kate is stunning with her hair down, but less so with it up, as it just accentuates her size. Is she 6'5" or something, or are all the other actresses tiny? I can't tell. I think the Bridgerton boys A through C are all hot, which is strange because I don't tend to dig white guys.
If I keep watching, it'll be for the decor and the cute dog. The dress fabrics are stunning, but A-line dresses do nothing for anyone.
Anonymous wrote:I just finished the second episode. It's okay, and overall I like the story more than the absurd "I will dramatically pull out of my twelve year old looking bride to stick it to my dead father" thing from last season. But I'm already so TIRED of it. Eloise is a feminist and doesn't want to do any of this. We get it. Kate doesn't approve of Anthony for Edwina. WE GET IT. I don't know if I can stand another six hours of this.
Also, is Kate super tall or is Edwina super short? I know that they share only one parent, but the height differential is ridiculous.
Since everyone is so hung up on what they look like, I actually think the moms are the best looking women in the cast. Mrs. Sharma and Mrs. Bridgerton are both really pretty. Kate is stunning with her hair down, but less so with it up, as it just accentuates her size. Is she 6'5" or something, or are all the other actresses tiny? I can't tell. I think the Bridgerton boys A through C are all hot, which is strange because I don't tend to dig white guys.
If I keep watching, it'll be for the decor and the cute dog. The dress fabrics are stunning, but A-line dresses do nothing for anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Because I love the time period, I tried watching the first few episodes and couldn't get past how fake and unhistorical it was. It is soapy but calling it regency romance is really stretching it. It's obviously popular so my opinion carries no weight![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kate Sharma doesn’t look pretty to me in the previews. I’m not seeing the chemistry at all.
Shake, is that you?