Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“The Dobbs decision of 15 weeks” what is he even talking about 
[twitter]https://x.com/acyn/status/1775693795092287709?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote]

I think he means that Dobbs would have allowed Rs to make 15 week bans, but they went too far and it's biting them in the butt. But maybe that's not what he means.

Really this whole conversation would be so different right now if Rs had in fact just put in place a bunch of 15 week bans with exceptions for life of the mother, serious fetal issues, and cases of rape and incest. I think this issue would have largely died down by now.

But I guess give it to them, they were true believers and took their shot.[/quote]
The problem is that "the life of the mother" is subjective to Rs, and they feel that a lawyer should decide that rather than a doctor.

Look at the TX case.

Rs have created a death panel of lawyers.[/quote]

Agree. I think the country would be ok with a 15 week ban and a "health of the mother" exception.  It is otherwise impossible to know when the brink of death occurs.[/quote]
Again, absent protections for abortion, the forced birthers would immediately begin chipping away at abortion access as they did for fifty years. 15 weeks is as bad a “compromise” as anything. It’s ceding ground to forced birthers, chips away women’s rights and your hypothetical completely ignores termination for fetal reasons.

The government as an instrument of religious extremists needs to stay out of women’s bodies. Abortion should be regulated by doctors like every other procedure in the country is. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics