Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2035, 2034, 2033 Girls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The next 5 national champs: 2019 Maryland 10 m&d and 7 heros 2018 JMU 1 m&d and 1 heros 2017 Maryland 11 m&d and 4 heros 2016 UNC zero 2015 Maryland 10 m&d and 1 heros Cycles, man. And this is just a quick and dirty using the bios on the team websites and clubs aren’t listen for some, so the numbers might be higher. I’m not affiliated with either club, but I’ve been around long enough to see patterns, and some really strong young local players have a great opportunity to win titles in the near future. When there are m&d and heros alum on those teams, make sure to rerun your analysis. [/quote] You’re legit pulling stats from 11 years ago[/quote] Ok, we will only look at the behavior of the champs over the past 5 years. Here is a look at what BC and UNC have been up to: BC: 2027 class 1 from m&d black 2026 class 1 from m&d and 1 from HG, with a transfer who played for m&d UNC: 2025 class 1 from m&d 2024 class 2 from m&d 2022 class 1 from m&d Looks like BC is picking up its recruiting in the bmore area, and UNC will always have a few from here. These are the exemplary teams that we need to look to for club trends, right? NW has always done it differently with recruiting, but they have tried to get m&d and HG girls; why would the champs bother if these programs weren’t still producing talent? Look, i get it…hoco is the best club ever, they are going to take over md club lacrosse, and nw, bc, and unc are going to exclusively get their players from there. Leave poor old m&d and heros alone![/quote] “Tried to” and “looks like” and “always done it differently” and “behaviors” don’t change the stats. Maybe you could cite more “cycle” data from the 1950s to guide the discussion?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics