Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Biden wants RTO"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election. [/quote] +100 THIS! [/quote] This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then. [/quote] I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote. [/quote] Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden? [/quote] For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out. The average pay raise per year: 3.71% Under Republicans: 4.05% Under Democrats: 3.65% https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/[/quote] Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation. [/quote] I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.[/quote] I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!![/quote] The right to choose is already gone. Strange to hinge your vote on an issue that is no longer even up for debate at the national level. And what exactly has Biden done to raise corporate taxes?[/quote] Maybe the feckin’ useless Dems should have codified the right to choice and interstate reproductive services [b]when they had the chance.[/b] [/quote] When exactly was that? [/quote] Oh I dunno, maybe during the multiple time periods when the controlled Congress and the Presidency. [/quote] Tell me you don't understand the filibuster without telling me you don't understand the filibuster. Are all feds so ill-informed? [/quote] they never even tried[/quote] You seriously aren't this stupid, are you? Feds, is this a good example of your ranks? Because if so, I think you feds should continue to work at home because you aren't able to operate a car safely, or be trusted out of the house on your own. [/quote] stfu “ “When it starts to take too long, you see the Democratic Party essentially saying: Well, we’re not going to worry about this, we’ll get to this later,” Ziegler said. ” feckless. https://19thnews.org/2022/01/congress-codify-abortion-roe/?amp [/quote] Did you even read the article, you dolt? It makes the rather obvious point that it's impossible to pass a nationwide abortion law with the current makeup of the Senate. It's this kind of magical thinking, combined with a lack of civics knowledge, that convinces rational people that progressives are not to be takes seriously. [/quote] the CURRENT senate. the Dems had opportunities in the past and did not take them … because they did not prioritize reproductive rights.[/quote] Is that so? Well, it shouldn't be too much trouble for you to point to the filibuster-proof majority in the Senate that would codify nationwide abortion rights - along wiht a democratic house and a democratic president. It troubles me that so many people (or maybe just this one vocal one) are so clueless when it comes to basic civics. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
