Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://projects.propublica.org/the-year-after-a-denied-abortion/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=majorinvestigations&utm_content=feature

This article is just heart rending. It’s a good example of the way the forced birther states practically go out of their way to force people in the sad circumstances into worse and worse situations. Who is this benefiting? Is this “defending life”? Who is well served, the newly sober mother? The newly sober father? The siblings who were already here? This cruelty serves nothing but to cause pain. [/quote]

It is benefiting Elayna, the baby that would have been aborted but now has a chance at life. I see why the mother felt like abortion was the best option, but it is pretty cruel of you to say that that child's life "serves nothing but to cause pain."[/quote]

Who is paying to support this child in life? The GOP cuts everyting from neonatal care to SNAP and the list goes on.[/quote]
I’m the one who posted the article and I encourage you to at least skim it. It’s a depressing romp through the GOP’s “culture of life.” Her parents started to make more than $39,700 a year and so the family lost their food stamps. Four kids, two parents. There are oodles of examples in the article of the way the GOP screwed them over and guaranteed misery (not the least of which forcing her to give birth to that fourth baby with a classical vertical incision. That pregnancy and delivery must have gone all kinds of sideways, and with her fragile sobriety? Horrifying to force that on someone.)[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics