No, Donald.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is he trying to lose this election?

No joke his dementia is advancing in real time. His filter and his ability to not say the quiet part out loud is fading. Snuck in amongst his lies and the gibberish will be little nuggets of the truth.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://projects.propublica.org/the-year-after-a-denied-abortion/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=majorinvestigations&utm_content=feature

This article is just heart rending. It’s a good example of the way the forced birther states practically go out of their way to force people in the sad circumstances into worse and worse situations. Who is this benefiting? Is this “defending life”? Who is well served, the newly sober mother? The newly sober father? The siblings who were already here? This cruelty serves nothing but to cause pain.

It is benefiting Elayna, the baby that would have been aborted but now has a chance at life. I see why the mother felt like abortion was the best option, but it is pretty cruel of you to say that that child's life "serves nothing but to cause pain."

This is a simpleton response.

I am adopted. I would be fine if my mother had an abortion... I wouldn't know the difference.

But her life would have been much better. I hate how she had to suffer because of her pregnancy with me, how other people treated her like garbage.

+1 from another adoptee.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"There are 13 states trying to put constitutional amendments protecting abortion on the 2024 ballot—but not if anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America can help it."
https://msmagazine.com/2024/02/27/susan-b-anthony-pro-life-america-abortion-ballot-measures/

They’re all about letting voters decide until it’s time to let voters decide. Then they don’t want any of that noise.

In other words, they’re slimy liars who will give any justification for what they want, even if it contradicts previous justifications for their positions, because they don’t have any actual convictions, and every position they articulate is just about getting what they want right in that moment.

Correct.

Which is why, when Trump and the GOP are hinting (and sometimes Trump is openly saying) what they plan to do, even if it sounds far fetched and totally ridiculous, understand that the GOP has no scruples and will say or do whatever they want to get what they want.

No one believes what he says other than his base. What he says at this point about abortion or IVF or any reproductive issues is of little consequence. He overturned Roe with his SCOTUS picks and everyone knows it. He will have to suffer the consequences which likely include a bigger loss than last time around.

It’s not “him” I’m concerned about. Trump is only the symptom of the GOP’s rot.

+1

The GOP began to degenerate into stupidity with Newt Gingrich and conservative talk radio and then went from stupidity into sheer insanity with the rise of the Tea Party. It started long before Trump - Trump is just someone who came along, tapped into it, and emboldened, enabled and empowered that stupidity and insanity even further.

Anonymous wrote:

Is he trying to lose this election?

Anonymous wrote:

That “leave it up to the states” thing collapsed quickly. I know it was always a lie, but they didn’t even pay it lip service before running in with a planned national ban.

Not too many months ago it was a 16 week ban Trump and the GOP were floating, which really means getting in there and punishing the blue state women since forced birther states’ more draconian bans would still apply in their states.

Anonymous wrote:

This needs to be blasted everywhere. He is telling you what he'll do. BELIEVE HIM.

Anonymous wrote:

A 15 week ban still leaves a lot of people in a position of choosing between jail and termination. And does that mean a miscarragie could end in a jail term as well? It is a stupid soundbite that is still harmful to women's health.

Anonymous wrote:

He will never get the chance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://projects.propublica.org/the-year-after-a-denied-abortion/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=majorinvestigations&utm_content=feature

This article is just heart rending. It’s a good example of the way the forced birther states practically go out of their way to force people in the sad circumstances into worse and worse situations. Who is this benefiting? Is this “defending life”? Who is well served, the newly sober mother? The newly sober father? The siblings who were already here? This cruelty serves nothing but to cause pain.

It is benefiting Elayna, the baby that would have been aborted but now has a chance at life. I see why the mother felt like abortion was the best option, but it is pretty cruel of you to say that that child's life "serves nothing but to cause pain."

Who is paying to support this child in life? The GOP cuts everyting from neonatal care to SNAP and the list goes on.

I’m the one who posted the article and I encourage you to at least skim it. It’s a depressing romp through the GOP’s “culture of life.” Her parents started to make more than $39,700 a year and so the family lost their food stamps. Four kids, two parents. There are oodles of examples in the article of the way the GOP screwed them over and guaranteed misery (not the least of which forcing her to give birth to that fourth baby with a classical vertical incision. That pregnancy and delivery must have gone all kinds of sideways, and with her fragile sobriety? Horrifying to force that on someone.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://projects.propublica.org/the-year-after-a-denied-abortion/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=majorinvestigations&utm_content=feature

This article is just heart rending. It’s a good example of the way the forced birther states practically go out of their way to force people in the sad circumstances into worse and worse situations. Who is this benefiting? Is this “defending life”? Who is well served, the newly sober mother? The newly sober father? The siblings who were already here? This cruelty serves nothing but to cause pain.

It is benefiting Elayna, the baby that would have been aborted but now has a chance at life. I see why the mother felt like abortion was the best option, but it is pretty cruel of you to say that that child's life "serves nothing but to cause pain."

Who is paying to support this child in life? The GOP cuts everyting from neonatal care to SNAP and the list goes on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://projects.propublica.org/the-year-after-a-denied-abortion/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=majorinvestigations&utm_content=feature

This article is just heart rending. It’s a good example of the way the forced birther states practically go out of their way to force people in the sad circumstances into worse and worse situations. Who is this benefiting? Is this “defending life”? Who is well served, the newly sober mother? The newly sober father? The siblings who were already here? This cruelty serves nothing but to cause pain.

It is benefiting Elayna, the baby that would have been aborted but now has a chance at life. I see why the mother felt like abortion was the best option, but it is pretty cruel of you to say that that child's life "serves nothing but to cause pain."

This is a simpleton response.

I am adopted. I would be fine if my mother had an abortion... I wouldn't know the difference.

But her life would have been much better. I hate how she had to suffer because of her pregnancy with me, how other people treated her like garbage.

Anonymous wrote:https://projects.propublica.org/the-year-after-a-denied-abortion/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=majorinvestigations&utm_content=feature

This article is just heart rending. It’s a good example of the way the forced birther states practically go out of their way to force people in the sad circumstances into worse and worse situations. Who is this benefiting? Is this “defending life”? Who is well served, the newly sober mother? The newly sober father? The siblings who were already here? This cruelty serves nothing but to cause pain.

It is benefiting Elayna, the baby that would have been aborted but now has a chance at life. I see why the mother felt like abortion was the best option, but it is pretty cruel of you to say that that child's life "serves nothing but to cause pain."

Anonymous wrote:

I am amazing the GOP is doing all of this before the election. You would think they would await the results before they show how evil they are.

Especially when Planned Parenthood is basically where America’s young women get their health care.

The GOP is psychotic.