Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "How likely for save act to pass senate? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are [/quote] You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does. [/quote] Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics. Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote. And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject. But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind. thank you for that morning chuckle. [/quote] I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID. The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans![/quote] The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.[/quote] Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words. [/quote] And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?[/quote] Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted. Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting? Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it. Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. [b] If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.[/b] And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it. It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.[/quote] Find me the data that show mail-in ballots are fraught with fraud. Thanks![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics