Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so most people register to vote at age 18. I guess they’ll need a passport or certified birth certificate. People aren’t married at age 18, mostly (I do know exceptions).

To vote during election, this person would then need to show a drivers permit, or license, or a passport/card. If they married after registering to vote, they’d need to show updated photo id or the marriage record.

If they divorce, they’d need to show updated photo id or court order showing name change.

What’s the issue?

The issue is that the United States does not have a voter fraud problem.

Then what’s the issue? If there’s no fraud, requiring ID won’t change anything.

How does one positively confirm a person matches a voter registration if they don't show an ID?

Please cite the number of times someone showed up to vote to discover someone had impersonated them and voted in their place.

(it doesn't happen, this is a non-issue)

The only instance I know of was a guy who voted twice, once for himself and once for his dead mother. He used her photo ID to get an absentee ballot.
He was a republican and voted for trump.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-government-and-politics-d34effeea6c341d6c44146931127caff#

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Except the SAVE Act is doing more than what this poll is asking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Show us proof or stop talking out of your ass.

They don't have proof. All they have is random half baked anecdotes from back in our grandparents day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Show us proof or stop talking out of your ass.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

So, college students who attend school out of state shouldn't vote? The homebound shouldn't vote? U.S. citizens employed/residing overseas shouldn’t vote?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?