Reply to VRSC

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "VRSC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
[quote=Anonymous]Love to hate? The MLS Next II teams are sub par, the director just got forcibly removed from the club and there are no quality coaches onboard. The so called great 2009 girls team has no recruits despite the "stellar" coach. Compare to our VDA team that has so many commits already. BP is the man. The remainder of the girls travel coaches are like the MLS Next coaches = sub par. [/quote]

[quote=Anonymous]Saw VRSC 09s play two times this fall already. There isn’t one player on that team that is good enough for D1 women’s soccer.[/quote]

Wow, classy VDA parents! LOL. Yet VDA 09s could only win 3-1 against VRSC. And then only manage a tie against Wilmington and Courage? Guessing you are just upset as it has been a very tough start for the fall without your USYNT players. You have a coach who is great at recruiting both bringing players in and exporting them to college...regardless if they deserve to be on that level or not. That is his job.

As for VRSC, I agree maybe not much, if any P4 talent, but some of those players will likely play at small and Mid Major D1 schools. Maybe some go to High Academic DII or DIII. Dunno, time will tell. Doesn't matter as maybe one, maybe two from DMV will play professionally. Funny thing is some of those DIII players will make more money fresh out of college than any of the D1 players or professional players. That is why your post and opinion above means 100% absolutely nothing. But hey, if you like posting meaningless rude opinions about teenage girls, keep on with you bad self.

#truthhurts[/quote]

A 3-1 score in football is not considered a close game. The losing team wasn't drubbed but the winning team won by a comfortable margin and likely wasn't concerned about losing.

There are no "high academic" Division II schools.  That isn't to say they are all terrible schools. Some are "Ok" but that is about it academically.  Yeah, some of their better teams are better than lower DI teams on the playing field. Same as with some of the best DIII teams. However,  most kids aren't going DII for learning reasons, unless it's because they are a decidedly average to below average student who can't get into a better school.

You type a lot but say very little of anything with substance or truth to it.

#truthhurts[/quote]

Bruh, you came in here at midnight on a Monday and dropped an ugly unnecessary opinion.

Here is something of substance. Your VDA team can’t beat last seasons last place ECNL team or the 5th place team. Meanwhile, your competition absolutely destroyed them on the very same weekend. That is very apples to apples.

Better get your USYNT players back soon because results like that are very telling. Like the 09s aren’t very good without only two of its players. Good thing the top NVA players came because the team probably would have lost,[b] just like they used to before BP brought all of those players.[/b][i]

#TRUTHHURTS

Almost 300 pages of hate and all of you still throwing stones from your glass houses and worried about a club that isn’t producing at this point. #GetANewHobby[/quote]
Didn't that same VDA team go to the Round of 16 the two years prior to BP showing up? Just sayin'. Yeah, the loss of a starting player to injury and another starter to camp has to have some effect on the team, but there always seemed to be a lot of other solid players there as well (including the new additions). And yes, there is a steeper hill to climb to get into the playoffs this year for a team with two draws to start off, but it is still one of the most competitive teams in area, if not the best team North of Richmond and South of Philly (for what that's worth, but competitive even those teams).

#NotEvenAVDADad[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics