Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2024 Girls Lax WCAC ISL Outlook"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone able to give an honest assessment of Visi/GC game? Talent on both sides had to be legit, wondering how Freshman on either side were able to contribute. I would imagine that’s as good as it gets for girls lacrosse around here.[/quote] Good Counsel looked solid all around. Both teams looked a bit rusty. Didn't help when Visi lost #22 for the game in the first half - did not think the second yellow was warranted. GC freshman goalie did not look like a freshman. Tough spot to be in if you're the two juniors on the roster. GC's NW commit looked good, but any contact that's made against her she acts if she got clobbered trying to get calls. She's too good to need to add that to her game so hopefully it's a one off. Thought it would be a tighter game. Until I see otherwise, GC is the team to beat in the DMV.[/quote] It was a good game between 2 great teams. Visi's #22 second card was a slash and was warranted. After the first card players need to be aware of their situation and adjust accordingly. She did not. NW commit and ND commit were getting hammered all game and they played through it. NW commit got taken off her feet twice in the 8. No acting was needed. Also Visi players on the redefend were swinging all game. I was actually surprised more yellow cards were not given. The refs let 2 good teams play for the most part.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics