Anonymous wrote:Any predictions on the BI and SR games today?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone able to give an honest assessment of Visi/GC game? Talent on both sides had to be legit, wondering how Freshman on either side were able to contribute. I would imagine that’s as good as it gets for girls lacrosse around here.
Good Counsel looked solid all around. Both teams looked a bit rusty. Didn't help when Visi lost #22 for the game in the first half - did not think the second yellow was warranted. GC freshman goalie did not look like a freshman. Tough spot to be in if you're the two juniors on the roster. GC's NW commit looked good, but any contact that's made against her she acts if she got clobbered trying to get calls. She's too good to need to add that to her game so hopefully it's a one off. Thought it would be a tighter game. Until I see otherwise, GC is the team to beat in the DMV.
Anonymous wrote:Move on folks, GC was just the better team yesterday and looked better prepared.
GC has depth
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone able to give an honest assessment of Visi/GC game? Talent on both sides had to be legit, wondering how Freshman on either side were able to contribute. I would imagine that’s as good as it gets for girls lacrosse around here.
Good Counsel looked solid all around. Both teams looked a bit rusty. Didn't help when Visi lost #22 for the game in the first half - did not think the second yellow was warranted. GC freshman goalie did not look like a freshman. Tough spot to be in if you're the two juniors on the roster. GC's NW commit looked good, but any contact that's made against her she acts if she got clobbered trying to get calls. She's too good to need to add that to her game so hopefully it's a one off. Thought it would be a tighter game. Until I see otherwise, GC is the team to beat in the DMV.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone able to give an honest assessment of Visi/GC game? Talent on both sides had to be legit, wondering how Freshman on either side were able to contribute. I would imagine that’s as good as it gets for girls lacrosse around here.
Good Counsel looked solid all around. Both teams looked a bit rusty. Didn't help when Visi lost #22 for the game in the first half - did not think the second yellow was warranted. GC freshman goalie did not look like a freshman. Tough spot to be in if you're the two juniors on the roster. GC's NW commit looked good, but any contact that's made against her she acts if she got clobbered trying to get calls. She's too good to need to add that to her game so hopefully it's a one off. Thought it would be a tighter game. Until I see otherwise, GC is the team to beat in the DMV.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone able to give an honest assessment of Visi/GC game? Talent on both sides had to be legit, wondering how Freshman on either side were able to contribute. I would imagine that’s as good as it gets for girls lacrosse around here.
Second card was very questionable. Looked like a definite hold, so not sure how it was construed as a yellow. Maybe the ref had it as a slash?Anonymous wrote:Hope calls against visi jr were obvious, as thats a huge loss
Anonymous wrote:There are some talented girls on Visi, but also some overrated as well. Will balance out, but that is the truth.