Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2030 Girls Lacrosse"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]MDU not blowing up, lost 1 player right now, I’d expect 2-3 more gone at end of summer but I expect them to pick up a few too. I think the one that left already joined a local team.[/quote] Don't think mdu can replace the players leaving with equivalent talent. But if they can keep down to just a couple players leaving, they should be alright.[/quote] There’s nowhere to get anywhere near the equivalent talent for the girls they’re losing. They had a hell of a run keeping those top girls together for so long. [/quote] I’ve seen this at club level and HS level, sometimes adding or losing talent doesn’t translate to more success or more goals. As example, HG not going to score X more goals per game adding a great goal scorer, the production will just come from less other people. Others will step up in the absence of others, same with injuries hitting a team [/quote] Club and high school are different enough that I’ll focus on club, where rosters can stay relatively stable for years. In that setting, the impact of each additional strong player depends on how much talent a club team already has. Adding top players to an already excellent club team usually yields only modest gains because their skills overlap with existing players. Losing those same players, however, can cause a much sharper decline for the team they leave, because each one represented a meaningful share of its overall ability and leaves gaps that are harder to replace. If there is no clear path to replacing that talent, other players often decide to leave as well. Once the collapse begins, it rarely stops, and there are few or no recent examples of a strong MS team losing its best players and still competing at a similar level in HS.[/quote] I have an older daughter as well and I recall this playing out with Coppermine when she was in MS. Up through 8th grade they were one of the top teams, and then lost a bunch of top players before high school. They actually did a decent job backfilling with good players, including a very good player from NJ who will probably be a T100. Anyway, they are now ranked 40.[/quote] Best player from that 28 Coppermine team went to HG. Sounds like history is repeating itself, rough for the girls further down on the depth chart.[/quote] Best two players really, and it didn’t help HG. [/quote] My DD plays for HG. Agree wholeheartedly. But now our girls have a higher level of anxiety and learning about this new player by way of email left a bitter taste in all of our mouths. [/quote] Wouldn’t email be the best way to communicate? Why would that make you bitter? It’s the club world, replacing good with great, that’s how you stay at top and let’s be honest, HG 2030 has never lived up to the clubs reputation. They typically are top 5 nationally in every grad year, now they are on their way. [/quote] HG going to replace MDU in top 5 after this is over[/quote] Perhaps. But MDU encouraged their player to go ahead and leave if she was looking, so MDU may have talent coming. MDU midfielder is very good but there are definitely multiple better middies in Baltimore - already on my DD’s MnD black and on HG[/quote] Honestly, the director is such a spiteful dufus, she probably did tell her best players to go elsewhere, lol. But they don’t have anyone coming in, there isn’t anyone to bring in. [/quote] I wouldn’t have a lame duck player finish out the summer either, who cares? Time to move kids around and see who can feel void. At best, it’s a distraction. [/quote] Yeah, except one of the two leaving wasn’t gone, just looking around as you should. Pushing her out the door is idiotic.[/quote] Not too long ago club tryouts were after tournament season was mostly over. Then they were pushed earlier and earlier as teams tried to be first to hold them so they could force girls to decide within 48 hours and prevent them from going to other clubs' tryouts. This combined with "open practices" has created a terrible atmosphere where girls getting ready to play with their team for the summer are leaving early, replacing girls from current teams etc. It is never going to go back to the way it was, but I wish it would. Even worse is when tryouts happen and girls are cut and they have 2 more tournaments with their team...[/quote] And yes the MDU club director is notorious for telling girls "don't come back" if they go to an open practice or are shopping around (not even have decided to officially leave the team), but does not actively try to get girls to replace them.[/quote] If she bounced people for going to open practices they’d down many more players than one [/quote] Shhhhh leave the girls alone that are trying to do it under the radar unlike the HG new player and her parents who told everyone she was leaving and the 2 girls she was trying to bargain with HG to being with her[/quote] Who does she think she is?! Charlotte North?! LMAO[/quote] All these parents think their kid is the next Charlotte North. [/quote] Or Chloe Humphrey. lol. Overinflated sense of self will catch up and it’s more painful the older the girls get. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics