Reply to Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is literally the case; I do not care about it, nor should anyone else. I don't think it was a mistake; it might have been an "error," but come on, this is an MS-13 member. Not a kindergartner who ended up in prison in El Salvador. He is where he belongs.

He was afraid of his own government and of his gang. Why are we allowing protected status to horrible gang members who leave dead bodies of innocents to show their power?
Many Salvadorans are pleased with their president and how he is making going to the grocery store less stressful, rather than Squid Games.
I call this a good error for us.[/quote]

You are making claims that do not match the legal record--this is from the 4/4 order upheld by the 4/6 ruling.

Abrego Garcia was born and raised in Los Nogales, El Salvador. ECF No. 1-1 at 2. His
family owned a small and successful pupuseria. Id. For years, they were subject to extortion and 
threats of death by one of El Salvador’s most notorious gangs, Barrio 18. Id. at 2.[b] The gang used
Abrego Garcia as a pawn in its extortion, demanding that his mother give Abrego Garcia over to
the gang or he and others in their family would be killed. [/b]Id. at 3. Attempting to escape the gang’s
reach, the family moved three times without success. Id. To protect Abrego Garcia, they
ultimately sent him to the United States to live with his older brother, a U.S. citizen, in Maryland.

2 Defendants did not assert—at any point prior to or during the April 4, 2025, hearing—that Abrego Garcia was an
“enemy combatant,” an “alien enemy” under the Alien Enemies Act, 50 U.S.C. § 21, or removable based on MS13’s recent designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization under 8 U.S.C. § 1189.[b]Invoking such theories for the
first time on appeal cannot cure the failure to present them before this Court. In any event, Defendants have offered
no evidence linking Abrego Garcia to MS-13 or to any terrorist activity.[/b] And vague allegations of gang association
alone do not supersede the express protections afforded under the INA, including 8 U.S.C. §§ 1231(b)(3)(A), 1229a,
and 1229b.

In Abrego Garcia’s case, the IJ concluded that he was
entitled to such protection because the Barrio 18 gang had been “targeting him and threatening
him with death because of his family’s pupusa business.” ECF No. 1-1 at 2.[b] DHS never appealed
the grant of withholding of removal, and so the decision became final on November 9, 2019.6[/b]

So it was Trump's DHS that did not object to the grant once it was issued. 
Now Bondi's DOJ has suspended their own lawyer for not lying in the proceeding. He had the choice to abide by legal ethics or be punished by the DOJ. 
Are you arguing that deporting him upholds law and order? Or just makes you happy regardless of the law?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics