Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/Newsweek/status/1716680923465564178[/twitter][/quote] Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution. (Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)[/quote] I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes. [/quote] They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance [/quote] It’s not a federal crime to travel to another state to engage in activity that is legal under federal law or the state where you’re going. Federal funding can and needs to be cut off. If Texas wants to play at independence let them pave their own roads. [/quote] It is a state crime. You can try to cut off federal funding, I'm sure speaker Johnson will be really open to that argument. That seems like a precedent that democrats are dumb enough to push for and then wonder why it's used against them when republicans are in power. Democrats had both houses and the presidency and a super politician, but Dark Brandon didn't bother to codify Roe v. Wade and didn't do any at all to address the court the McConnell effectively packed for a generation. [/quote] Roe v Wade, the precedent that the lying fascists all said was settled law? Why would he codify a law that was already settled law? Forced birther clown. :lol: [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics