Anonymous wrote:Will the poster who is blaming Democrats and women for Republicans being animals without a moral compass please sit down? You sound like a rape apologist, and I’ll bet you are one.

The blame for the death and destruction wrought by the GOP belongs exclusively to the GOP. No one else. They should be stripped of their citizenship, sterilized, their children taken from them, and deported to the Vatican for what they’ve done, and maybe someday they will be. At a minimum they should be canceled so hard from public life they need to beg in the streets for food scraps.

In the meantime, put the blame where it belongs. The GOP engaged in a decades long conspiracy to put religious nut-bags with no ethics on the court, and they got exactly what they paid for. It wasn’t accidental, it was deliberate and long in the making. They fought very hard to push an amoral position, and now the country is in chaos and women and children are dying. Blame them.

And they still own and run all the media. NBC, CBS, ABC, Wapo, NYT. All of the big “mainstream” communications outlets are owned by fascist Republican companies. This is part of their conspiracy: control the message and make it look as if people have a choice. Put Fox over there in the crazy corner, but really it’s all Republican friendly.

Will the poster who is blaming Democrats and women for Republicans being animals without a moral compass please sit down? You sound like a rape apologist, and I’ll bet you are one.

The blame for the death and destruction wrought by the GOP belongs exclusively to the GOP. No one else. They should be stripped of their citizenship, sterilized, their children taken from them, and deported to the Vatican for what they’ve done, and maybe someday they will be. At a minimum they should be canceled so hard from public life they need to beg in the streets for food scraps.

In the meantime, put the blame where it belongs. The GOP engaged in a decades long conspiracy to put religious nut-bags with no ethics on the court, and they got exactly what they paid for. It wasn’t accidental, it was deliberate and long in the making. They fought very hard to push an amoral position, and now the country is in chaos and women and children are dying. Blame them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

When did Biden “have the chance” to codify Roe v. Wade? Which nine or ten Republican Senators would have supported that?

The senate makes the rules. McConnell knows that they can be changed for important issues. Schumer and Biden haven't caught on

When has a majority of the Senate supported nuking the filibuster?

When republicans needed to get judicial nominees through

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

When did Biden “have the chance” to codify Roe v. Wade? Which nine or ten Republican Senators would have supported that?

The senate makes the rules. McConnell knows that they can be changed for important issues. Schumer and Biden haven't caught on

When has a majority of the Senate supported nuking the filibuster?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

It’s not a federal crime to travel to another state to engage in activity that is legal under federal law or the state where you’re going. Federal funding can and needs to be cut off. If Texas wants to play at independence let them pave their own roads.

It is a state crime. You can try to cut off federal funding, I'm sure speaker Johnson will be really open to that argument. That seems like a precedent that democrats are dumb enough to push for and then wonder why it's used against them when republicans are in power. Democrats had both houses and the presidency and a super politician, but Dark Brandon didn't bother to codify Roe v. Wade and didn't do any at all to address the court the McConnell effectively packed for a generation.

Roe v Wade, the precedent that the lying fascists all said was settled law? Why would he codify a law that was already settled law?

Forced birther clown.

After he was elected when the court was 6-3, the senate and house both blue, and Dobbs on the docket

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

When did Biden “have the chance” to codify Roe v. Wade? Which nine or ten Republican Senators would have supported that?

The senate makes the rules. McConnell knows that they can be changed for important issues. Schumer and Biden haven't caught on

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

When did Biden “have the chance” to codify Roe v. Wade? Which nine or ten Republican Senators would have supported that?

Anonymous wrote:If red states want to make themselves a hell scape no woman will willingly want to live in, let's see how that works out for them.

If anyone knows any conservative politicians / pastors, their wives or their daughters who use a Texas highway to drive to get an abortion, please report them.

+1. And if you are a border state abortion practitioner and would like some assistance vetting your clientele to weed out Republican fascists who believe in rules for thee but not for we, please post so we can help you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

It’s not a federal crime to travel to another state to engage in activity that is legal under federal law or the state where you’re going. Federal funding can and needs to be cut off. If Texas wants to play at independence let them pave their own roads.

It is a state crime. You can try to cut off federal funding, I'm sure speaker Johnson will be really open to that argument. That seems like a precedent that democrats are dumb enough to push for and then wonder why it's used against them when republicans are in power. Democrats had both houses and the presidency and a super politician, but Dark Brandon didn't bother to codify Roe v. Wade and didn't do any at all to address the court the McConnell effectively packed for a generation.

Roe v Wade, the precedent that the lying fascists all said was settled law? Why would he codify a law that was already settled law?

Forced birther clown.

If red states want to make themselves a hell scape no woman will willingly want to live in, let's see how that works out for them.

If anyone knows any conservative politicians / pastors, their wives or their daughters who use a Texas highway to drive to get an abortion, please report them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

It’s not a federal crime to travel to another state to engage in activity that is legal under federal law or the state where you’re going. Federal funding can and needs to be cut off. If Texas wants to play at independence let them pave their own roads.

It is a state crime. You can try to cut off federal funding, I'm sure speaker Johnson will be really open to that argument. That seems like a precedent that democrats are dumb enough to push for and then wonder why it's used against them when republicans are in power. Democrats had both houses and the presidency and a super politician, but Dark Brandon didn't bother to codify Roe v. Wade and didn't do any at all to address the court the McConnell effectively packed for a generation.

I’m sorry, Speaker Who? Which nominee are we on now? The GOP would actually need to get its crap together if they’d like to overrule executive action. Good luck with that.

Thanks to McConnell running roughshod over Schumer, the courts would strike down any executive action long before it could take effect. The challenge would be filed in Amarillo Texas where it would be heard by a right wing ideologue. Texas would easily win. It would be appealed to 5th Circuit where republicans hold the clear majority and then to the supreme court where the Republicans hold a 6-3 majority

Your assumption is that Democrats will continue to play by the rules that your guys rigged. Not one I’d be relying on, honestly. A friendly trade association could file something the same day in the DC Circuit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

It’s not a federal crime to travel to another state to engage in activity that is legal under federal law or the state where you’re going. Federal funding can and needs to be cut off. If Texas wants to play at independence let them pave their own roads.

It is a state crime. You can try to cut off federal funding, I'm sure speaker Johnson will be really open to that argument. That seems like a precedent that democrats are dumb enough to push for and then wonder why it's used against them when republicans are in power. Democrats had both houses and the presidency and a super politician, but Dark Brandon didn't bother to codify Roe v. Wade and didn't do any at all to address the court the McConnell effectively packed for a generation.

I’m sorry, Speaker Who? Which nominee are we on now? The GOP would actually need to get its crap together if they’d like to overrule executive action. Good luck with that.

Thanks to McConnell running roughshod over Schumer, the courts would strike down any executive action long before it could take effect. The challenge would be filed in Amarillo Texas where it would be heard by a right wing ideologue. Texas would easily win. It would be appealed to 5th Circuit where republicans hold the clear majority and then to the supreme court where the Republicans hold a 6-3 majority

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

It’s not a federal crime to travel to another state to engage in activity that is legal under federal law or the state where you’re going. Federal funding can and needs to be cut off. If Texas wants to play at independence let them pave their own roads.

It is a state crime. You can try to cut off federal funding, I'm sure speaker Johnson will be really open to that argument. That seems like a precedent that democrats are dumb enough to push for and then wonder why it's used against them when republicans are in power. Democrats had both houses and the presidency and a super politician, but Dark Brandon didn't bother to codify Roe v. Wade and didn't do any at all to address the court the McConnell effectively packed for a generation.

I’m sorry, Speaker Who? Which nominee are we on now? The GOP would actually need to get its crap together if they’d like to overrule executive action. Good luck with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

It’s not a federal crime to travel to another state to engage in activity that is legal under federal law or the state where you’re going. Federal funding can and needs to be cut off. If Texas wants to play at independence let them pave their own roads.

It is a state crime. You can try to cut off federal funding, I'm sure speaker Johnson will be really open to that argument. That seems like a precedent that democrats are dumb enough to push for and then wonder why it's used against them when republicans are in power. Democrats had both houses and the presidency and a super politician, but Dark Brandon didn't bother to codify Roe v. Wade and didn't do any at all to address the court the McConnell effectively packed for a generation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who cares about a little thing called the commerce clause? Constitution? The GOP don’t need no stinking Constitution.

(Isn’t this old news? Did they re-ban it or move forward?)

I think Dark Brandon needs to shut off the highway funds to Texas until they decide to start following the Constitution. Texas boys will lose their crap once the potholes get so big they eat their Tahoes.

They are following the Constitution. Banning the use of highways in the commission of a crime is nothing new. If you don't like abortion being a crime, then you should blame Dark Brandon for being so focused [twitter]on infrastructure that he never bothered to push for Roe v. Wade to be codified when he had the chance

[b]

This is cute BS. We all know this Christofacist Supreme Court wasn’t going to allow something like a Congressionally enacted law from preventing them from bringing about their theocratic hellhole.