Reply to Why don't white students go to Banneker?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Why don't white students go to Banneker?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think the white PPs just honestly find it impossible to believe that an all-black high school could be intellectually rigorous and successful at preparing students for top colleges. [/quote]

I think the black PPs just honestly find it impossible to believe that Banneker is neither as intellectually rigorous nor as successful at preparing students for top colleges as other available options, especially for whites, Asians, Latinos and high SES blacks.

So be it.[/quote]

Oh come on. Banneker is clearly doing something very right, given its college placement and AP results. Maybe it is not the same as TJ but that is not the question. The question is why don't any white parents, at all, even consider this very good school as compared to other good DC options like Walls and Wilson? [/quote]

I don't understand the comparison to TJ.  According to the latest stats, white people are shunning TJ, and the Asian population is increasingly dominant.  So based on this thread, most of the whites who responded said that the school was not rigorous enough; the school was no TJ; and, the school reported too low SAT scores.  Hmm, if that is truly the reason, why are whites also declining in enrollment at TJ?  [/quote]

Go find the SAT scores for TJ, compare them to Wilson and to Banneker, and you will see the answer.[/quote]

No, that's not the answer to the question. White people are using SAT scores for their reasons to not send their children to Banneker. What is the reason for white people not sending their children to TJ, a largely Asian populated magnet school with great SAT scores? 
[/quote]

You are a bit slow today, aren't you?

SAT scores at TJ are super high, showing it is a very competitive, race-blind, school. Many white students do try to get in; few do, because there's better qualified (often Asian) students.

SAT scores at Wilson are relatively high for a non-selective and super diverse school. Disclosure: my kids (Latino) will probably end up there.

SAT scores at Banneker at surprisingly low for a selective school. Why would whites (or other with better alternatives) send their kids there, unless for some reason they are looking for an all-black immersion experience?

[/quote]

Yes, slow.  To be clear.  Banneker is not all black.  They have a high Latino population.  They also have Asian students.  Again, if a great college is your end game, Banneker is it.  If you are caught up into SAT scores - I don't know, you have so much attitude - why in God's name would you send them to Wilson.  Wilson is nothing to write home about.  I am inbounds to Wilson and my kid is afraid to go there.  And I'm black.  [/quote]

I won't tell you what to do with your kid, so please don't tell me what to do your mine, especially when you obviously are quite ill-informed. There are many more Latino (and Asian) at Wilson than at Banneker, and going to great colleges, AND learning how to live in the big world out there, instead of self-segregating themselves in a small and [b]very artificial environment[/b].

It is great that DCPS offers different choices, as we live in a very diverse city. I am in this thread because the title question intrigued me, and I wanted to learn more about the school. What I have discovered is multiple reasons why it makes no sense for my kids to even consider Banneker. I wish the school well.[/quote] I'm not the pp quoted, but regarding the bolded, What is artificial about the environment at Banneker?  That's such an odd thing to say.  I'm a current Banneker parent, btw.[/quote]

I'm not any of these PPs, and I don't necessarily agree with PP you quoted in bold.

However, I think what PP is saying here is that an all-black environment, and frankly, an all-black-led and all-black-all-high-achieving environment, is not representative of broader society. Following high school graduation, or at the latest, following graduation from a historically black college, Banneker grads will need to navigate a world in which whites are the majority and blacks occupy few positions of power or influence. Similarly, graduates from an all girl school will encounter a male-dominated work environment in most fields. I think this was the point, that a school like Wilson is a more realistic introduction to the world out there. Again, I don't necessarily agree that such an "artificially controlled" environment is such a bad thing during formative years, but this was PP's point.

[/quote]

WTH.  I went to a women's college so OMG, I can't navigate the real world?  Dumb as hell.  Going to a women's college empowered me in ways that you can't imagine.  Funny how so many successful women attended women's colleges.  So according to you, no women's colleges either.  They are not the "real" world.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics