Reply to What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Another thread taken over by republicans who think all democrats care about is trans issues. Notice that it’s the republicans bringing it up all the time. You think it is the center of the democratic platform because Trump told you so. Nobody is trying to “push men into women’s spaces.” Democrats simply think most of these issues are not federal cases!

Democrats think it is none of our business what pronouns people use. Why do you care so much? You don’t have to like it, but that doesn’t mean you need to run to the feds. Maybe you work with someone who uses they/them and you don’t want to comply. Ok, fine. It is actually pretty easy to avoid third person pronouns all together. I have relatives you don’t want to use they/them for a non-binary relative. They just avoid it by using their name all the time. So maybe try that simple solution rather than pushing for legislation?

There’s been very few cases of trans women competing in HS sports. Why shouldn’t this be handled locally on a case-by-case basis? There are many factors that should be considered, such as hormone levels. It simply isn’t a an issue that is prevalent enough to need federal attention. It especially shouldn’t be a major factor in determining who you vote for.

I keep hearing republicans talk about all these little girls being raped by trans women in public restrooms. Personally, I have never heard of this happening. Maybe we can get some numbers to compare sexual assaults in bathrooms carried out by cis men vs trans women? Why do we not care about little boys being assaulted in men’s restrooms?

Republicans need to learn to deal with things without running to their orange god to make all their problems go away. Please. Go back to being the party of small government. Stop running to Daddy Warbucks every time you encounter someone different from you. [/quote]
Your old talking points didn't work and these new ones about "local" handling of your regressive agenda won't work either. No, we're not going to leave your agenda to the local level that you can more easily co-opt now that you have lost the nation as a whole after years of misusing federal mechanisms for trans overreach. Right is right and wrong is wrong and men in women's spaces and sports is wrong. It needs to end locally, federally, everywhere. We're not negotiating a middle ground with you any more than we're negotiating with the local pedophile a number between the 0 we prefer and the 100 he prefers for a middle ground on how many children he gets to molest. He gets 0, you get a firm no on picking taxpayers' pockets to pay for men's breast implants and everything else you claim is a trans right, and you can both deal.

Also, you know that the 79% of Americans who openly reject your agenda admit despite your emotional blackmail are on both sides of the aisle. This isn't a Republican issue any more than the trans agenda is a human rights issue. This is about reality and beating back your cabal of highly organized grifters who have taken America for a ride for way too long.[/quote]

Wow you sure are passionate about where kids stand on the medal podium. Are you this passionate about kids not getting shot at school? Do you call for gun control as loudly as you call for your daughter’s place at the podium? If you find yourself being more outraged by a trans athletes than school shooters, you might want to do some self-reflecting. I am not trying to change the subject here. It has just been glaringly noticeable to me. You guys shrug off a classroom of dead kids as unavoidable collateral damage to protect your right to own any and all guns. But a trans kid in a podium? THAT’S a bridge too far for you?

I acknowledge that trans kids in sports is a complex issue. I am not going to say they should always be allowed, point blank. I don’t know anyone who wants that. But I do think there are cases where they should be allowed to compete and cases where they shouldn’t. I think it should be handled locally, case-by-case, because the community is obviously more knowledgeable on that particular case than feds. I would want medical records to be taken into account. Maybe that athlete’s previous rankings in boy’s sports. I don’t know. I won’t claim to have all the answers. But in the rare instance that this comes up, I know that a bunch of old dudes in DC certainly aren’t experts either. [/quote]
Do you call for a ceasefire in the Democratic Republic of the Congo as loudly as you call for boys to be granted special rights over girls? You shrug off dozens of villages of dead women and children as collateral damage to protect the western lifestyle you enjoy due to America's looting of Congolese resources. But an abused woman who wants to take refuge in a domestic violence shelter without being accosted by your crazy son in a wig? THAT's a bridge too far for you? If you find yourself offended by a girl who wants to take up contact sports to build her confidence without being brutalized when your local thug turned transwoman is matched up with her, you might want to do some self-reflecting. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics