Reply to Van Lifer couple camping in Utah national park - two weeks later fiancee arrives in FL alone

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Van Lifer couple camping in Utah national park - two weeks later fiancee arrives in FL alone"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Unpopular theory - I think they have been 100% cooperating with the FBI since Brian went missing. Doesn’t excuse the silence starting Sept 1 but still. Do we know the exact date they lawyered up?[/quote]

This has bothered me for some time — we have absolutely no idea what they have and have not told the FBI. The speculation about whether they have cooperated (or not) is purely that — speculation. [/quote]

I mean they raised an abuser who turned out to be a murderer and harbored a fugitive.  And also didn't mention he was missing for days after he left?  Give me a break.  They should be held responsible for Gabby's death by the public court for the rest of their lives, and they will be.[/quote]

You are speculating about all of this. It's frightening how fast the "Court of Public Opinion" makes judgments before they have heard any of the facts.  The fact that the Laundries haven't spoken publicly is taken as evidence that every wild accusation against them is true.  It may be that all of this is true.  It may not be.  What is so bad about waiting to hear from the Police?  If the Police were to make a statement that the Laundrie's have been cooperating all along and were instrumental in finding Brian's remains (the latter appears to be the case), will you feel differently?

You better hope none of your children ever do anything wrong, since you seem to believe that the parents are always responsible for the sins of their children.  [/quote]

The "Police" in North Port haven't seemed like the brightest bulbs here...and yes, I definitely think they were instrumental in finding his remains. I think the theory floating around that they knew where he was hiding in the preserve and were hoping he was alive could be accurate.  If they went to this spot themselves when it reopened to the public, found him, and then decided to 'lead' authorities to him to try and get the public/LE off their backs, it frankly makes more sense than deliberately stonewalling access to their child when his fiance who lived with them for a year plus was missing (and he came home in her van).

Why else wouldn't you report him missing right away? Other than to give him a head start?  And how do you mix up the day he left?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics