Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2035, 2034, 2033 Girls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Coaches don’t always work out like planned, even at top clubs. What you want from a club is that they: recognize, respond, pivot, regroup, bolster. Not just let it ride or double down. Not super familiar with the situation but a little. It seems they are resourcing this team, which I assume is what everyone wants. The one thing I heard is that a Manchester Valley High School coach is now leaning in. “M&D develops teams, not players.” This makes no sense. I don’t think this holds up, though it sounds nice. Continuously trying to improve a team year over year (here, it’s not fun for anyone to be 1-7) in part through recruiting or tryouts doesn’t mean the club isn’t developing the girls it has currently. They aren’t mutually exclusive. It’s not a zero sum game. Development of one is development of the other. If you’ve ever seen a top club practice, if you’re a player, you’re getting massive individual development as the team is developed. That said, it’s not akin to a skills clinic or 1x1 session, though I’m sure if that’s what’s needed, it’s done. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics