Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "H1b visas. Anyone else work in technology and see the issues with this program and outsourcing? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants. [/quote] There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children. But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.[/quote] You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare). https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/[/quote] Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread. My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.[/quote] BULLSHIT. Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts) Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify – 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control. – These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded. 2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744) – Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet). – Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout. – Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes. Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors – DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors. Bernie Sanders (2019) – Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which [i]his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system[/i]. State‑level Democratic support (Florida) – Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals. When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.[/quote] Maybe you didn't see the link above, but they clearly don't support it at the state level unlike Republican states.[/quote] Maybe you don't read news, things like this makes the link above not so valid https://floridapolitics.com/archives/730790-democrats-join-republicans-supporting-e-verify-for-small-businesses/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics