Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Maybe you didn't see the link above, but they clearly don't support it at the state level unlike Republican states.

Which link - the I9 one above? That shows a ton of red states like North Dakota have not mandated e-Verify. In fact only 38% of red states have across-the-board e-Verify mandates.

Even South Dakota only has voluntary e-Verify. If even Kristi "ICE Barbie" Noem couldn't get mandatory across-the-board e-Verify passed in a deep red state like South Dakota when she was Governor there, the PP's narratives about how this is all about Democrats collapses pathetically.

Democrats think that is important South Dakota, but what about California. California actually restricts the use of voluntary e-verify.

Oh, noes liberals saying stuff on the internet again.

Oh, noes MAGA making nonsensical arguments again when their lies are called out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Maybe you didn't see the link above, but they clearly don't support it at the state level unlike Republican states.

Which link - the I9 one above? That shows a ton of red states like North Dakota have not mandated e-Verify. In fact only 38% of red states have across-the-board e-Verify mandates.

Even South Dakota only has voluntary e-Verify. If even Kristi "ICE Barbie" Noem couldn't get mandatory across-the-board e-Verify passed in a deep red state like South Dakota when she was Governor there, the PP's narratives about how this is all about Democrats collapses pathetically.

Democrats think that is important South Dakota, but what about California. California actually restricts the use of voluntary e-verify.

Oh, noes liberals saying stuff on the internet again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Maybe you didn't see the link above, but they clearly don't support it at the state level unlike Republican states.

Which link - the I9 one above? That shows a ton of red states like North Dakota have not mandated e-Verify. In fact only 38% of red states have across-the-board e-Verify mandates.

Even South Dakota only has voluntary e-Verify. If even Kristi "ICE Barbie" Noem couldn't get mandatory across-the-board e-Verify passed in a deep red state like South Dakota when she was Governor there, the PP's narratives about how this is all about Democrats collapses pathetically.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Maybe you didn't see the link above, but they clearly don't support it at the state level unlike Republican states.

Which link - the I9 one above? That shows a ton of red states like North Dakota have not mandated e-Verify. In fact only 38% of red states have across-the-board e-Verify mandates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Maybe you didn't see the link above, but they clearly don't support it at the state level unlike Republican states.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Maybe you didn't see the link above, but they clearly don't support it at the state level unlike Republican states.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

BULLSHIT.
Examples of Democrats Backing E‑Verify (with concrete receipts)
Democrats repeatedly reauthorized and funded E‑Verify
– 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013 reauthorizations all passed with Democratic majorities or unified Democratic control.
– These votes kept E‑Verify alive and expanded.

2013 "Gang of Eight" bill (S.744)
– Co‑written by four Democratic senators (Schumer, Durbin, Menendez, Bennet).
– Included mandatory nationwide E‑Verify with phased rollout.
– Passed the Senate 68–32, with every Democrat voting yes.

Obama administration expanded E‑Verify for federal contractors
– DHS under Obama strengthened the system, added photo‑matching, and required E‑Verify for federal contractors.

Bernie Sanders (2019)
– Told Washington Post he supported "a smart and fair employment verification system," which his campaign confirmed meant an improved E‑Verify‑type system.

State‑level Democratic support (Florida)
– Reporting shows some Florida Democrats introduced or backed bills requiring all employers to use E‑Verify, alongside GOP proposals.

When you live in the MAGA bubble reality is a lie. And then you get outside of your bubble, totally oblivious to FACTS like this and lie when you accuse Democrats of never supporting e-Verify.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Since when do liberals go around caring about being wrong. They have lied and been called out numerous times in the thread.

My favorite is "Democrats support e-verify". You need to do a better job calling out your own.

Anonymous wrote:Now compounding the H1-B crunch on American workers: Report out from the Partnership for Public Service shows that nearly 400,000 federal employees have been pushed out of government since Trump started his second term.

In federal government, two of the three biggest categories of employees are nurses and IT workers - and no doubt many of the 400,000 pushed out of federal work were in those classifications. We import tons of nurses from the Philippines etc. Perhaps that needs to be re-evaluated as nurses pushed out of the VA look for work. Likewise, IT. Many feds working in IT have specialized IT expertise that is hard to find in the private sector, like cybersecurity, geospatial, and so on. Again, we need to be pumping the brakes on H1-B and prioritizing American workers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

You are wrong. They are not all undocumented, and you know that. If you want to demand that MAGA drop the patriarchy, then those jobs will surely pay more. But, since MAGA hates women and children, that's not going to happen. GenX has officially screwed themselves (and their GenZ children who won't have childcare).

https://rollcall.com/2025/01/09/trumps-immigration-plans-could-imperil-long-term-care-workforce/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.

There is something very fundamentally wrong with a country which relies on exploiting illegal immigrants to care for its most vulnerable people – the elderly and children.

But if the system only works by having very cheap labour to do these jobs, create a visa sub class specifically for this. Then you can ensure there are bare minimum protections like healthcare, a floor on remuneration, and conditions like how long the worker can remain in the country, whether they are tied to a particular employer or agency, etc. One of the main reasons to have an immigration system is to identify and address skill shortages.

Anonymous wrote:Who'll care for children and elderly? Those two industries depend largely on illegal or new immigrants.