Reply to TJ results out

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ results out"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am sure if the new admissions has been as successful as they claimed, TJ teachers would not have to send out emails like this

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fce9c3e5e-6b7e-4005-a69f-b01e0c68c8a1_1600x900.png

[/quote]

Wows, I wonder what happened last year.[/quote]

That was not last year. DD as a freshman last year and I recall seeing this email string post while we were delivering that spring of 2022 whether to send her or not. It was from the 2021-2022 year.

Moreover Math 4 “normal track” is mainly a sophomore class. “Normal track” for the first batch of new admission system kids would have been Research Statistics and Math 3 freshman year in 2021-2022. That means it was mainly - or at least a very large share - the kids under the last old admissions system class in Math 4 that year. [/quote]

Bingo. The email header even says "Spring '22" on it. The only kids who would have received that email from the Class of 2025 would have been [i]significantly[/i] advanced in math.[/quote]

Remember the Class of 2025 only had about 20 something Alg 1. So, this course had a few Alg 1 from the Class of 2025 and most from Geo from the Class of 2026. This shows an even crazier truth, even Geo freshmen in the new admissions are not ready for a normal TJ curriculum.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics