Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Airplane noise concerns overblown?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Living in a less than ideal, polluted location is not a death sentence. Yes, there is a higher chance one may have health issues but the probability of having thorn is small, so even if it doubles, it’s low anyways. Besides, you can offset that higher likelihood by adopting healthy behaviors in other area. I live in the flight path and in hindsight I would not buy here again. However now here we are. We don’t have any health issues and have never heard of health issues from my neighbors. I also have never heard of asthma among my kids’ friends. There was a report based on actual health issues (stroke, asthma, etc) among the DC residents and I didn’t see the neighborhoods under the flight path faring worse. The worst were low income areas in SE and SW, which don’t seem to be affected by airplane pollution. Somebody has been repeating that Georgetown East and Woodley Park do better but I think that doesn’t mean anything for us. It may very well due to other factors like an average younger population or who knows. We do have many older residents in the Palisades, not sure how that is in comparison with other neighborhoods. People need to have some common sense. There are myriads of factors affecting one’s health. Pollution and noise are two. If you get very stressed about noise and/or pollution this area is not for you. High stress may be worse that whatever you are hearing or breathing.[/quote] To be fair, that report correlated PM 2.5 pollution and health outcomes which have the potential to doublemask the true situation. First because PM 2.5 doesn’t measure the ultra fine particulates and jet emission pollution and second because the health outcomes are intertwined with the access to healthcare. It was still odd that on stroke and COPD that area didn’t do as well as the neighboring equally expensive areas.[/quote] I think this is the figure comparing estimated vs actual pollution health effects: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/5513e6f4-53ee-49b2-918d-e2a7d7b7b8d7/gh2283-fig-0005-m.jpg Where do you see palisades does worse? Admittedly, I am not the best at interpreting these scientific articles but I am genuinely interested. Source: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021GH000431 There are many more neighborhoods beside WP and GE not affected by the planes so again, I don’t take away anything with respect to aviation pollution from the fact they do better. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics