Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The "cop a look phrase" never came from Blake. This was something Wayfarer put in that timeline document early on -- it is their characterization of how Lively later described the incident when she discussed it with Heath and Baldoni. They claim she said she knew he wasn't trying to "cop a look." But Blake never testified to saying that. She has consistently said that she told him not to come in and then when he insisted, asked him to look at the wall, and then he looked at her anyway.[/quote]

They specifically brought up that quote at oral argument so they have something more than recollection.   They probably recorded the conversation where she said it.  Jamie Heath recorded pretty much everything.[/quote]

He testified he rarely recorded anything but a handful of phone calls he turned over in discovery.[/quote]

Again, the WF lawyers are relying on some piece of evidence when making the representation to the Court.  Blake has been found to be lying with respect to pretty much all of her allegations, so not surprising this is another one.[/quote]

You can't even point to a court transcript saying they made that representation in court. What is your evidence this was even raised in court? Some tweet with a summary of oral arguments?

And no, there is zero evidence that they are relying on "some piece of evidence" (that for mysterious reasons has not been listed in any of the pleadings thus far nor unsealed) when they say stuff like this. That comment originally came from the timeline Wayfarer put together early in the case. It has not been corroborated and Blake certainly didn't testify to.

This is increasingly embarrassing for the Baldoni Bro.[/quote]

Well, you posted the entire oral argument transcript posted on Twitter word for word in this thread and it’s very clearly there.  [/quote]

No, [expletive redacted for manners]. I posted direct quotes from Lively's deposition as recorded by an official court reporter and submitted on the docket, and linked directly to that deposition so you can check to see that I transcribed it correctly. I wasn't quoting a Twitter thread because I'm not a total idiot.[/quote]

You cherry picked. I read Blake’s deposition and she told him he could come in b/c she did not want to have to postpone the other meeting. She also did say in front of witnesses at a subsequent meeting I know you weren’t trying to cop a look.[/quote]

Blake only said he could stay (in order to avoid postponing the meeting) after Jamey enters without permission and refuses to leave when asked. This is very clear in her deposition.

Where are the depositions of witnesses saying that Blake said "I know you weren't trying to cop a look"? Where is the evidence this actually happened?

I feel I should also say that insisting on looking at a colleague who is undressed is still harassment even if you aren't doing it to "cop a look." It is a violation. If your boss walked in on you when you were in your underwear and you asked them to leave and they refused and just stood there looking at you, would it matter to you if they weren't like turned on by looking at you? They might be doing it to humiliate you or simply to show you that you don't have the power to decide when they look at you and under what circumstances, even just to assert that you should be clothed before speaking to them. And if your job literally required you to undress at work multiple times a day, as Blake's does, a boss who insists they have a right to look at you while undressed would feel very threatening, don't you think?

So even if he wasn't "trying to cop a look," it was still wrong for him to insist on holding that meeting while Blake was naked and could not get dressed. It's still a violation.[/quote]

There is other evidence on the record that Blake wasn’t nude and Heath was in her trailer for only a few minutes (less than 5 per both Jamey and Blake’s account).  He later apologized to her in the event that the encounter may her uncomfortable and she responded it’s ok, I know you didn’t cop a look”. Perhaps start reading the WF evidence and legal filings instead of just Blake’s.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics