Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not surprisingly, Blake has already been caught lying in her depo.  She testified at deposition that she didn’t tell anyone to unfollow Justin, but Coleen Hoover, when asked at her deposition why she unfollowed Justin, replied that Blake told her too.

Not surprising at all that Blake would lie in her deposition when there are multiple allegations in her complaint since revealed to be lies.[/quote]

And yet people are literally showing you right now that what people on this thread have alleged to have been "revealed" as lies are not lies, and that Lively's deposition testimony and that of other witnesses are corroborating her allegations from her complaint.

I really am starting to think that the Baldoni Bro on this thread is a paid shill because why would anyone go to bat for Baldoni in this way despite clear evidence to the contrary? No one even knew who he was before all this. It makes no sense.[/quote]

Lady, there is the dance scene, her lies about telling others to unfollow him, her lies about the black panties, her lies about the birthing  video, her lies about the circumcision conversation, her lies about Flaa, etc . .  
[/quote]

Cite it. Show us the lies. Not a link to a reddit thread or a summary of a tweet. Show us the evidence proving she lied. I want to see it.[/quote]

Why do you think this thread is 108 pages.  Because you keep rehashing the same disproven allegations over and over.  It’s all in here lady, start on page one and reread if you must.[/quote]

So what you are saying is: you can't cite it. Gotcha, Baldoni Bro.[/quote]

No, I am saying there is so much evidence that contradicts Blake’s complaint that it can’t be contained in one post but you can go back and read all of it.[/quote]

Try starting with some of it then. Should be easy, right? Lay out how the evidence disproves one of her claims.

Use actual evidence though. Not reddit is Twitter. Links and quotes. [/quote]

DP but this is bugging me. People keep using Reddit as if is not a reliable source. I’m not the poster you are referring to, but when I have used Reddit, I mean that I get the actual links to documents there. Official court documents, the depositions, texts submitted to the court and such.

Yes, there is a lot of commenting on Reddit and videos of lawyers like nag doing analysis which is interesting too, but when many of us are referencing something on Reddit are actually meaning that that is how we get the official court documents.

There are some very diligent posters on Reddit who have organized the court documents very nicely and linked to them so people can follow the case closely. I just don’t think we should be dismissing that.[/quote]

DP (not the person you are replying to) and I agree with this. There are parts of reddit like that. But there's also parts where someone will take a screenshot of something from the docket, highlight it (let's say, it's from Wayfarer's account of what happened) and post it as "proof that Blake lied" or something. I think that's the type of thing that's being referred to, not people who are getting links to the full documents via reddit. I like to ask for the full, in-context source, no issues with that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics