Reply to Realignment for SEC

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Realignment for SEC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!

(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.). [/quote]

It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic. [/quote]

It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”

The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell. [/quote]

You realize that the SEC has a copy of the decision as well? HR could have simply shared it in their email regarding the union decision.

I am confused over why you keep insisting that a union you are not part of, sends you an email? You sound like a bitter child who keeps digging in. [/quote]

Have you seen the union’s webpage? It has news and updates about every other stupid thing that’s even tangentially related to federal employment.  But glaringly absent is ANYTHING about the arbitration. — not even a mention, much less the opinion. It’s truly bizarre, and anyone who says otherwise has an agenda or isn’t telling the whole story. Shady AF. [/quote]

I’m a little surprised that they wouldn’t post it, but I’m having trouble seeing how that’s shady.  They sent it to everyone in the union and it’s not hard for others at the agency to get a copy.

Maybe there is some rule with the arbitration that it is not truly a public (as in outside the agency) document, although that would surprise me.

Since you are so troubled by them not posting it, what’s your theory?  It’s all well and good to call it shady AF but how?  What’s the actual agenda or angle you think they are playing here?  Or do you just want to rant with your tinfoil hat on?[/quote]

PP wasn’t talking about posting the OPINION. They were talking about posting the NEWS of the arbitration win. Like, perhaps in the news section of the sec nteu website.  Shady AF that the website is crickets on this. [/quote]

Why? The NTEU sent an email on its listserv announcing the decision. It did the same with the HHS decision. You sound like a pathetic lonely person PP. Clearly your life is so empty that you need this to obsess about.[/quote]

Somebody’s a little sensitive about this. I wonder why. Don’t get your panties in a bunch. Don’t pretend it’s not weird to have a big website with News announcing every mundane silly event related to federal unions, but then failing to mention one of the biggest opinions that lots of people had been waiting for.

Why have a news section at all, if events are just emailed on the “listserve.”

Are you really this obtuse? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics