Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Is a wedding at a 'plantation' bad form? or romantic? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So the plantation used to be worked by slaves and then not. Some of the original slavery era structures are on the property. The house is lovely. It seems like a tone deaf choice for a wedding venue in 2019. What do feel about plantation venue for a wedding? Is it just me?[/quote] I don't see the issue, either. (Full disclosure: I'm white). I respect others may feel strongly otherwise. But, there are many horribly, brutally racist places in the world. Should kids not go to formerly racist colleges (or less racist now)? What about being married in a Catholic Church (home to decades long Pedophilia cover ups)? Yes, the history is horrific. But, as long as it's not covered up (e.g., like Mount Vernon, imo), I don't see the problem. Things change, evolveand you can "Take back" something previously ugly and turn it to something more positive. [/quote] Slavery may have pervaded institutions but the plantation system was the actual institution of slavery, so yes there is a difference. [/quote] What about black-owned plantations?[/quote] Just stop. There weren’t free blacks in the south. Escaped slaves in the north were legally required to be returned to the south. Free blacks in the north didn’t own plantations.[/quote] Just stop what? You clearly don't know your history. Because there were free blacks in the American South. It was not the law that all blacks had to be slaves. Maryland was a slave state and had a big free black population and there were small communities in all the other states and especially in the cities. Both Charleston and New Orleans had thriving communities of free blacks. Life certainly wasn't ideal but it shows you're flat out wrong with the comments. And there were a few black slaveowners in Louisiana, including one or two planters. You should Google it. It is fascinating. And of course plenty of black slaveowners in Africa but that's a different topic. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics