Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Yesterday's controversial Humans of NY posting about 9/11"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote] Actually it was pretty stable- especially compared to Europe from about the 13th century through the end of WW1. [/quote] No, there was plenty of instability in the OE in the 19th c, which was quite a different time from earlier centuries. In particular the last few years before WW1 saw the Young Turk coup, and an attempted counter coup. [quote]Ppl need to stop apologizing for US involvement- what we did in Iran was disgusting, what we did in Iraq was disgusting- Secularism (The Baathist agenda) is always stuffed down people's throats. even here- look at the religious pushback against LGBT rights. [/quote] I am not sure what this means. [quote]people have the right to self determination- ALL people, even brown ones. We routinely take that away from people. [/quote] Er,no we do not . Though in fact the right to self determination does not exist in international law. The right of states to sovereignty does, which is something quite different. [quote]If people are ready for democracy they need to fight and bleed and die for it. [/quote] Many peoples have achieved democracy without bleeding and dying for it. Not every democracy is a result of violent revolution. [quote]If ppl (the MAJORITY of Chinese/Majority of UAE subjects/Majority of DANES) like their government they can keep it, [/quote] And if they do not like it, they will likely keep it anyway. Overthrowing a dictatorship is not that simple, though it happens. [quote]its not the right of some outside force to come liberate them.[/quote] While you are broadly correct about international law, there is no particular reason it has to be that way. Certainly under international law a state CAN act internally to liberate people. And when open fighting has taken place within a state, IE a civil war, it is routine for outsiders to intervene, although the international law is complicated. [quote] As an example- we can't just remove women from abusive situations, we have to support them but they have to make the choice on their own. [/quote] Well we could, but in our particular society we choose not to. Anyway I don't think the ethics of how we treat domestic abuse, good or bad, necessarily extends to international affairs. [quote]And no the Mujahidin/Taliban were very much supported by the US. [/quote] Except US intervention ended before the Taliban were formed, and not all mujahadin joined the taliban. in particular Sheik Massoud, leader of a large part of the mujahadin, fought against and was killed by the Taliban[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics